Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Billy Ross
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Why a bank doesn't record a deed until closing?

Billy Ross
Posted

We purchase 5-7 REO's each month, and I have always had this question...

On at least 80% of the deals we do, the bank has not recorded the deed or CT, and they do not until right before closing. While it does not affect me, just always wondered why they did this. As an example, we are under contract on a deal where the original seller did a deed in lieu. The bank has not recorded the deed. Now, many sellers in financial trouble have other issues or pending judgments. If the bank does not record the deed and get themselves on title, there is the possibility that a judgment from the previous owners could potentially attach to the property. Now the lender has agreed to NOT foreclose on the property, but there is another lien attached, forcing the lender to move forward with a foreclosure action or negotiate the judgment/lien.

If I had to guess, I would say the lender does not want to be on title due to them doing something odd with their books and not actually taking ownership of the property, but that is just a guess.

Would welcome anyone with true insight on this.

Thanks!

Loading replies...