Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago,

User Stats

13
Posts
0
Votes
Mary Ann Rocco
  • Huntington Beach, CA
0
Votes |
13
Posts

short sale & commisions

Mary Ann Rocco
  • Huntington Beach, CA
Posted

I'm looking for better understanding about short sales and real estate commissions. I apologize for the length of this post.

The short sale has not been approved because of the 2nd with Chase, but I want to ignore the issue of the 2nd for now. I’m trying to understand certain numbers.

The property is in California and I’m the buyer. I signed a contract saying I would buy a house for 720,000 plus an additional out of pocket expense of 20,000 towards the second and 1% in commissions to the agents and another 1% to the negotiator which is an additional 14,400. I knew the agents were receiving a total of 5% commissions but as a first time home buyer I didn’t think to ask my agent where the other 4% was coming from.

The outstanding loan balance on the 1st (GMAC) is 656,000. The outstanding loan balance on the 2nd (Chase) is 175,000. The issue of the 2nd is a whole other post so I won’t go into detail on that. I have a copy of the GMAC short sale letter. It outlines the following numbers:

We agree to accept proceeds generated by 720,000. Seller to net zero. Net proceeds to GMAC will be no less than 653,000. Yes, that’s only $3,000 short.

It goes on to list all of the closing costs approved (not to exceed)
Taxes title, etc. = 8,515
6% agent commissions = 43,200
Payoff towards second = 15,000

I’m trying to understand the issue of the 6% agent commissions and that fact that I’m paying that on top of the amount owed to the bank. Something about this seems 'off' to me. I was told they moved the numbers around to make this short sale go through more easily. I realize that I signed a contract and the bottom line is what it is, regardless of how it’s ultimately divided, but is this normal practice in how the numbers work? I was under the impression that in a short sale, the banks would kick a certain percent back towards commissions. Since the total loan is only 656,000 GMAC is not really paying anything towards the commissions, I am. My agent thinks this is fine, and I trust my agent, but I can’t let go of this nagging feeling that something’s not right, but I know nothing about the the real estate industry. I feel deceived by how the contract was worded and how the numbers are playing out. Can anyone give me their opinion on this situation? Is this SOP in short sale world?

Mary

Loading replies...