Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

98
Posts
13
Votes
Peter Lee
  • Developer
  • Los Angeles, CA
13
Votes |
98
Posts

Value add profit split?

Peter Lee
  • Developer
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

If you had value-add deal which is currently structured at 95/5 equity contribution between LP/GP with a flat 70/30 distribution structure (no waterfall) after debt service. Now if say the GP then contributes 40% of the equity instead of only 5% by raising additional equity on his own how would you say the deal would change?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,756
Posts
4,399
Votes
Greg Dickerson#2 Land & New Construction Contributor
  • Developer
  • Charlottesville, VA
4,399
Votes |
4,756
Posts
Greg Dickerson#2 Land & New Construction Contributor
  • Developer
  • Charlottesville, VA
Replied
Originally posted by @Peter Lee:

@Greg Dickerson so you would adjust the 70% profit to be split pari passu amongst the non GP- investors regardless of who brought them in?  You don't think since now the GP is supplying almost 50% of the equity they would have more leverage in the deal?

If GP is providing 50% of equity required I would look to place the remaining equity with a preferred return only and no kicker.

Loading replies...