Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

138
Posts
113
Votes
Jeff Langley
113
Votes |
138
Posts

15% or 20% down? I can't decide

Jeff Langley
Posted

Hi all, 

I'm in the process of acquiring my first rental property and I'm struggling to determine which route to go. Do I put 15% down or 20% down? The biggest difference is the interest rate, 5.35% vs 4.25%. Neither will have mortgage insurance, although it's probably tied into the higher rate. Do I tie up more capital for the lower rate since these will be long-term plays, or do I put less money down to free up more transactions? I'd love to hear your insight. Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,156
Posts
2,660
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,660
Votes |
3,156
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

In retrospect I've always ended up benefiting by having less invested in a property...but that comes at the higher rate generally. But I have also realized that with better planning on my part there is a way to 'maximize' the benefit. I've found that I'm usually pursuing a rate and term refi at about year two after I've made improvements etc. and between appreciation and mortgage paydown I'm at the better LTV anyway. So adding the cost of the higher rate payment and the refi over say 30 months, and comparing it to my anticipated savings I can decide if it was worth it or not.

For example our primary residence was purchased at $520,000 with 10% down, 4.75% and $75 PMI. Had I done 5% down, 4.9% and $125 PMI it would have cost an extra $231/mo +/-. I refi'd in Jul 2020 which was 22 months after our purchase...(worst case scenario) had the interest rate at the time been exactly the same 4.75 as we originally got, and had the fees been 2.5% of the loan which I paid in cash, the refi would have saved me ~$8,500 of my downpayment ($26,000 additional 5% DP - $5,100 PMI and interest - $13,650 refi costs). That was worst case...reality is I timed the refi for a low rate, which happened to be historically low and appreciation historically high which combined made the actual result much better...but it would have been even better had I put the absolute minimum down when we purchased. 

I've always had a more 'old school' perspective on borrowing and not getting over-leveraged...so shifting my perspective to how the economics of today function takes work on my part...and I insure against this newer economic risk by holding that extra cash so it is available. But doing that I'm finding my investment profile improves much more easily and faster.

Loading replies...