Buying & Selling Real Estate
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 3 years ago,
Should We Sell These Properties?
We need help in analyzing what we should do with a couple of SoCal properties we bought around 8 years ago. Our goal is to free up some money (a substantial amount for non-REI purposes), as well as to increase our cash flow, and buy or retain a crash pad in that area of SoCal.
Property #1 is a SFR in a very good neighborhood in North San Diego County. Its valuations are: $641,800 USAA/$647k Realtor.com/$721,018 Redfin. It originally was bought for $432k as a future home at 3.75%, and I'd love to be able to keep it unless it's smarter not to. We financed $209k, so our down payment was $226k. We owe $156,800. It clears $600/mo. The HOA has stayed relatively low at $100/mo.
Property #2 is a condo in a family area of Orange County. Its valuations are: $484,700 USAA/$487,800 Realtor.com/$490,720 Redfin. We purchased it for $350k at 3.75%. We put $220k down and financed $130k. We owe $85k. It clears $525/mo. The HOA has ballooned over the past few years, from $225 to $400. We tried selling it a couple of years ago when it was a buyer's market, but we failed, and after three months, took it off the market and rented it, again. The biggest complaint was that it faced a parking lot and not the golf course. However, there are many condos in this area, and most of them face parking lots. It's over a thousand square feet, and the amenities are substantial: golf course; lake/beach; pool; rec room.
We're in our 70s, so there's no room for financial mistakes. We live in Phoenix, but SoCal is like a second home, and whatever we do, we still need something there for us.
Thanks.