Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
7
Votes
Maya German
7
Votes |
6
Posts

Should I stay or Should I go?

Maya German
Posted

Hello everyone,

First of all, I am new to BP and I enjoy reading people's posts. So here is my dilemma.  I am selling a couple of my rental properties in San Diego, CA and would like to do a 1031 exchange on a multi-family unit. I am not sure if I want to buy a multi-family unit in San Diego because of the high costs. I would like to know what would you do? Would you invest in other state like TX or AZ or stay here in San Diego. Any feedback is appreciated. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,060
Posts
6,998
Votes
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
6,998
Votes |
6,060
Posts
Dan H.
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
Replied

I will start by stating that I believe the RE market is an efficient market.  Prices depict a range of variables that basically boil down to risk and return.  For the return, there is both short-term and long term return.  Risk is made up of many items including eviction rates, tenant quality (very much a function of vacancy rates), vacancy rates, etc.

What this really means it that different markets have different strengths and weaknesses.  I recommend all newbies start local.  There are a plethora of reasons for this that I have posted elsewhere.  The OP is not a newbie.

So here is what I believe about the San Diego market:

  • Historically it has produced outstanding long-term returns.  This is a function of both the property and rent appreciation.
  • The rent appreciation has made San diego, contrary to popular belief, and outstanding market for long-term cash flow.  It is simple math that the market with the higher rent appreciation rate will always eventually produce better cash flow than the market with a lower rent appreciation rate.
  • The eviction and missed payment rate in San Diego is one of the lowest in the nation.  It is my belief that this is more a function of the low vacancy rate than the cumbersome eviction process.
  • Prop 13 is unbelievable benefit for long-term investors.  The state average property tax paid has been estimated at 0.77%.  The high appreciation cities pull this down.  What this implies for San Diego is that our average property tax rate is likely below 0.77%.  I know our (H3 Properties) property tax rate is way below 0.77%  We have multiple properties (close to half) that have rates near or below 0.5% of the value.  We have one that I suspect is below 0.25% of value.

As indicated, the market reflects multiple variables so here is the bad.  The bad is mostly short-term negatives:

  • High price of entry. Especially for the investor with no value add using traditional financing that is getting 80% LTV. This is less an issue if house hacking (95% LTV), doing a value add with a refi (extract out of investment), or using creative financing (obtaining higher than 80% LTV). It is why for a long time all or our acquisitions had a value add.
  • Poor initial cash flow.
  • Tenant friendly regulations.  I have found with the low vacancy rate, the tenant friendly regulations are of virtually zero impact but they are real.

I believe strongly that San Diego will continue to be an outstanding long-term market.  I also believe that many markets can produce better return in the short-term.

We are at about the maximum number of units we can handle without changes. If that were not the case, I would more actively be acquiring more properties (we closed on a quad New Years Eve, but our acquisition rate has slowed) like the ones we have (mostly duplex to quad). Because I am considering commercial MF (5+ units) and sustainability requirements on commercial financing, we may in the near future look non-local. It will not be because I do not have huge confidence in the San Diego market. It would be due to the sustainability requirements and my aversion to have to have LTV typically lower than 70% and often lower than 60% on San Diego commercial MF.

Good luck

  • Dan H.
  • Loading replies...