Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

149
Posts
80
Votes
Kalen Jordan
  • Austin
80
Votes |
149
Posts

Bigger Pockets podcast ads

Kalen Jordan
  • Austin
Posted

Bit of an odd rant, but does anyone else find it a bit odd that the BP podcast has ads? Since BP is a paid product, you would think they would either have no ads at all or only advertise the BP community.

Ads always dilute the message of a podcast host a little bit, depending on how well-curated they are.

The fundrise ad for example - Brandon says "this is the future of real estate investing" in his own voice. Does he really believe that? (Doubt it...that's generally not the kind of thing they are encouraging people to do in their actual content) So is he just saying that because they're paid to say it? Dilutes their credibility.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

149
Posts
80
Votes
Kalen Jordan
  • Austin
80
Votes |
149
Posts
Kalen Jordan
  • Austin
Replied

1. I don’t think the ads need to subsidize the product itself. The pricing is already at a premium.

I very much doubt anyone at BP needs the money - that’s the other thing that’s a bit confusing about this.

2. Definitely happy for BP to make money as well - but generally speaking product companies are more effectively monetized through their product vs. through advertising.

3. Yes I can see why sponsors like the opportunity :)

Agreed the ads aren’t badly placed - they’re well done. I just wonder how much trust I should be placing in them. For example, on the Tim Ferriss podcast he heavily vets products and you can trust that if you buy something that is advertised it’s something that Tim personally vouches for. I think that’s a good standard for a podcast to have for ads, especially when they can afford to have that standard.

If Brandon is saying “fundrise is the future of real estate investing” not because he believes it but just because they’re paying him to say it, that’s diluting his credibility. 

And for what? He doesn’t need the money clearly.

Or if there's an ad for a turnkey operator who isn't really among the best turnkey operators - is that really a net win for BP/the community to have the ad up?

Loading replies...