Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

47
Posts
16
Votes
Kyle Galloway
  • Northwest Indiana
16
Votes |
47
Posts

70% Rule-Please explain?

Kyle Galloway
  • Northwest Indiana
Posted

I understand the math to the 70% rule in house flipping. (Conservative Market value after repairs X.70 - repairs). What I don't understand is where this 30% magically disappears to. I know that there will be closing costs, some utilities during flip, some interest during flip depending on financing, and some closing costs-but does that really come close to 30%? My brother and I are currently rehabbing a house and will likely flip it vs hold it. Here is our situation:

ARV $110,000

Purchase Price       ($58,000)

Projected Repairs   ($15,000)

Profit before soft   $37,000

Our deal appears to be a home run before considering the soft costs. How is it possible that 30% of the ARV gets eaten up by these? Here is the 70% rule math and you see a completely different picture

ARV $110,000

70%          $77,000

Repairs     (15,000)

Max Price  $62,000 (we paid 58k)

In short I am having a hard time seeing us paying more than $8,000 in soft costs, yet this 70% guideline builds in $33,000 of soft cost (30%xARC). Why am I so far off? What am I missing?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,065
Posts
41,074
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,074
Votes |
28,065
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

Your purchase price, added to the cost of renovations and holding, should not be more than 70% of the sales price. The remaining 30% is supposed to be your profit.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
165 Reviews

Loading replies...