Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

54
Posts
65
Votes
Grayson Gist
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Kansas City, MO
65
Votes |
54
Posts

Why is DTI so hard to overcome?

Grayson Gist
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Kansas City, MO
Posted

Hey,

Long story short is that I’m trying to buy a second Fourplex and lender’s are quick to say no.

I currently own one SFR in Oklahoma, and one Fourplex in Kansas City that I owner occupy. My wife and I are trying to buy another Fourplex to owner occupy and banks are giving us a hard time about DTI.

I looked everywhere and read a few books and can’t seem to find the missing puzzle piece.

1. All the properties cover the mortgage and then some.... even when I am (and will) live in them.

2. I have about 1.5 years so far of “landlord” experience but only partial year reports on my tax return.

3. My W-2 job is about $80k a year.

I’ve heard the lender should just add the difference (positive or negative) to my income and not count the mortgage to my debt.

But I've also heard they take 75% the rent -PITIA and include the debt. So every property that would "break even" with that puts that DTI as 100%. Am I missing something?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,876
Posts
2,759
Votes
Stephanie P.
#5 Mortgage Brokers & Lenders Contributor
  • Washington, DC Mortgage Lender/Broker
2,759
Votes |
4,876
Posts
Stephanie P.
#5 Mortgage Brokers & Lenders Contributor
  • Washington, DC Mortgage Lender/Broker
Replied

@Grayson Gist

There are a couple of reasons:

  • Occupancy fraud is the number one type of fraud in the mortgage industry
  • Most people buy a 4 unit and then move up to a single family; they don't continue to buy 4 unit properties
  • FHA expressly says in its guidelines that "FHA will not insure a mortgage if it is determined that the transaction was designed to use FHA mortgage insurance as a vehicle for obtaining investment properties, even if the property to be insured will be the only one owned using FHA mortgage insurance." https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/4155-1_4_SECB.PDF ... so if you're trying to use FHA, you could be running into that guideline
  • Over 2 units, FHA requires the property to pass a self sufficiency test as well, meaning 75% of the market rents must cover the mortgage amount and they also have to apply a market vacancy rate to the mix.

Lots of reasons to just live where you're living now and get a portfolio loan that has none of the above guidelines.

Stephanie

  • Stephanie P.
  • Loading replies...