Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

2,237
Posts
2,450
Votes
Eric James
  • Malakoff, TX
2,450
Votes |
2,237
Posts

Strategy: Conditional 25% holdback to seller until I resell?

Eric James
  • Malakoff, TX
Posted

Do you think this type of approach would work, and is it currently being used in some form? Would there be anything illegal or ethical with it?

I'd like to hear if people think the following is a viable strategy for quick buying and reselling residential properties. I would locate interested sellers who have >40% equity in their SFH and do not have a contract with a RE professional to sell their house. I would accept to purchase their house immediately for a 5% discount below what they think the market value is (I could show them comps), as well as discounting the standard 6% RE sales commission. For example, if the expected market value is $200,000 I would sign a contract to purchase their house for $178,000 (11% reduction from $200,000). They would receive 75% of this money at closing, but the other 25% would either be held in escrow, or owner financed (not sure which would work better) until I resell the house. However, a condition would be that if $200,000 is not the true market value and I cannot resell it for this, the difference in my resale price will be discounted from the money they receive from escrow (or discounted from the seller financed note payoff).

The benefit to the seller is that they would immediately have their house under contract/sold (to me) and would receive 75% of their money quickly. The downside to the seller is the 5% discount they are giving me. Also, the house may not sell for what they had hoped. My profit would be the 5% discount they give me, plus another 3% commission when I resell (I am getting my RE license). In the above example, this would come to $16,000. This isn’t a huge profit, but would be $10,000 more than a standard sales commission. My cash on cash return (20% down if financing the purchase) would be around 25%. I could give the sellers another option of simply listing the property with me for sale, but in that case they would have to wait until the sale to receive their money. 

What do you think?

Loading replies...