Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on .

User Stats

5
Posts
2
Votes
Mark Jacobsen
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Lansing, MI
2
Votes |
5
Posts

Swapping "Seller" on a Land Contract

Mark Jacobsen
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Lansing, MI
Posted

Looking for the best options to acheive what amounts to the change of the "seller" in a land contract without triggering gift taxes or other "additional" fees. Specifically, SellerA and BuyerZ entered into a land contract in 2014 for a total purchase price of $80k. Currently, there is approx a $60k balance and the home is likely worth approx $100k. Now, SellerB (BuyerZ's son) would like to take over SellerA's interest/ownership (thereby cutting SellerA out of the picture completely) and have BuyerZ (his mom) make payments on the remaining $60k to him (over a longer period than the original contract between SellerA and BuyerZ). Hopefully, that makes sense.

My one current idea was to see if SellerA would assign/transfer the land contract to SellerB, and then just have SellerB restructure the payments. Thoughts? Is there a better way to do this?