Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
2
Votes
Mark Jacobsen
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Lansing, MI
2
Votes |
5
Posts

Swapping "Seller" on a Land Contract

Mark Jacobsen
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Lansing, MI
Posted

Looking for the best options to acheive what amounts to the change of the "seller" in a land contract without triggering gift taxes or other "additional" fees. Specifically, SellerA and BuyerZ entered into a land contract in 2014 for a total purchase price of $80k. Currently, there is approx a $60k balance and the home is likely worth approx $100k. Now, SellerB (BuyerZ's son) would like to take over SellerA's interest/ownership (thereby cutting SellerA out of the picture completely) and have BuyerZ (his mom) make payments on the remaining $60k to him (over a longer period than the original contract between SellerA and BuyerZ). Hopefully, that makes sense.

My one current idea was to see if SellerA would assign/transfer the land contract to SellerB, and then just have SellerB restructure the payments. Thoughts? Is there a better way to do this?