Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

105
Posts
114
Votes
Eric M.
  • Investor
  • Weston, WI
114
Votes |
105
Posts

10% of a $4 million deal or 100% of a $400,000 deal?

Eric M.
  • Investor
  • Weston, WI
Posted

@Brandon Turner always says that 50% of a great deal is better than 100% of no deal, but what about a small percentage of a large deal vs 100% of a smaller deal?

It seems like there is a lot of love for syndication and partners on BP. The advantages I see with that are that you can bring in expertise that you lack, along with being able to take advantage of some economies of scale.

On the other hand having 100% of control of a deal and not having to answer to anyone else sounds divine.

Curious what BP thinks about this.

Loading replies...