Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,320
Posts
1,059
Votes
Diane G.
  • CA
1,059
Votes |
1,320
Posts

MF worth half of the asking price?

Diane G.
  • CA
Posted

I read a couple of really good thread on this topic but can't find them now...Sorry starting a new thread here just so we can continue the discussion..

In the last 2-3 months of looking at MF, I noticed that MF listings ROUTINELY overstate the rent by 20% in addition to showing no vacancy/eviction/turn over etc.... I think you would be lucky if you end up getting 70% of the proforma rent.... On the expenses side, same thing, understatement of expenses.... Adding all things up, I ROUTINELY get to the conclusion that the listing is really worth about half of the asking price...

Now I have to imagine that this is how MF selling/buying always is....So my question is, is it common practice to offer half ish of the asking price? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,730
Posts
1,511
Votes
Jason Hirko
  • Lender
  • San Antonio, TX
1,511
Votes |
1,730
Posts
Jason Hirko
  • Lender
  • San Antonio, TX
Replied

@Diane G. It is standard practice to list the gross potential revenue, which of course does not account for vacancy, turnover, or any expenses. This is a good high-level measurement to let you quickly compare properties by current rent x # of units... For example, a standard 8 plex that is horribly managed by an absentee owner may run expenses at 80% of potential revenue, whereas costs on a 4 plex run very well may only be 40%. If all you got was the NOI, you would assume both of these properties should be priced the same, but that is not how it works. All of these measurements are just pieces to the puzzle. When I buy an MF property, I look at the P/L to see hard costs like property tax, insurance, utilities, etc., but the majority of soft costs or turnover costs are largely irrelevant because how the owner manages the property will be different than how I will, whether that is for the better or for the worse.

And as for the asking price to be double what its worth: 1) Its worth what someone will pay, and 2) make offers, not friends! Don't be scared to offend someone with an offer.

Loading replies...