Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

127
Posts
15
Votes
Ivan Jouikov
  • Renton, WA
15
Votes |
127
Posts

REO Weird Addenda?

Ivan Jouikov
  • Renton, WA
Posted

SO i have an REO property under contract and apparently the seller's agent sent us some forms that we're required to fill out as a part of "standard bank procedure." My Realtor said "sorry I don't know what they are" and got me to sign them anyway. I told him not to submit them until I get the reviewed by my broker and my lawyer. He said there's no need to because "banks use these forms all the time to protect their ***" - I'm still having a lawyer look at it though.

The section I'm most concerned about states

2. This contract is subject to acquisition of the Property by Seller

3. This contract is subject to approval and acceptance by Seller's mortgage insurance company and beneficiary, if any.

4. Final acceptance of the contract of sale is subject to Seller's committee approval.

Does this sound like short sale contingencies? The property is vacant and is listed as REO, but these subject to's got me worried.

Any suggestions?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

62
Posts
24
Votes
Jamie Keeton
  • Title Representative
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
24
Votes |
62
Posts
Jamie Keeton
  • Title Representative
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Replied

Sounds like the answers were obtained and some great ones at that!!! Nice answers.

I take issue with the fact that the listing agent is asking someone to sign something that they cannot explain. That's a sure tell sign that the transaction could be a bumpy one. Any person signing a contract should never sign unless they fully understand and agree to it. Period. Exclamation Point! So if you are not sure, please, please please have your questions answered before signing. It will save you a lot of headache/heartache down the road.

#2. As previously stated... these banks, FC attorneys and counties are so far behind on getting the titles into their name. I have done Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana and Florida and this is across the board. This clause just implies that their title deed may have not yet been recorded to reflect them as owner. The title company cannot close until this completed.

3 & 4... there are going to be several hands in the pot when dealing with REO. You have the bank seller, the Servicing company, the asset manager... Until it goes thru the chain of all those parties and their internal processes. Some asset managers sign off on anything and then the actual seller gets it and may take issue.

Thanks for checking on this before just signing. It's good you are looking out for you and your clients in this manner of detail. Pay close attention to the REO contract that pertains to concessions... make sure it is what you were seeking in your initial contract.

Loading replies...