Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
6
Votes
David Davidson
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
6
Votes |
19
Posts

Invest in existing loan or more leverage?

David Davidson
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I'd like to solicit the collective wisdom of BP for advice on deciding between two scenarios to invest a small windfall.  I have an existing cashflowing duplex with great tenants, and I live w/in earshot of, w a note about 4%. About 550k equity, in a neighborhood that appreciates cyclically but quickly.

With this new capital, I'm wondering what would be more beneficial: zero the note on the duplex or invest in a basket of SFHs.  Running the numbers it seems it works out the same.  For instance:

  • Scenario 1: zero duplex note w/ 335k. Yearly pre-tax CoC is 43k. Saves 222k in interest!
  • Scenario 2: put 335k in turnkey 20 SFHs meeting the 1% rule. Yearly pre-tax CoC is 44k.

One thing that zeroing the note does is remove the mortgage deduction.  But isn't that totally offset by not paying out 222k over the next 28 years and having it cashflow now?

The headache of building up those SFHs seems daunting and troublesome, compared to simply paying down a duplex.  I'm corresponding w/ several turnkey providers and just not finding too many good deals.. 

Scenario 3 would be to wait for a downturn to buy into dips.

I'm open to advice on what kind of questions should I be asking myself about this opportunity?

Thanks in advance

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,282
Posts
19,295
Votes
James Wise#5 All Forums Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH
19,295
Votes |
28,282
Posts
James Wise#5 All Forums Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH
Replied

@David Davidson I would expand the portfolio. 4% is cheap money. Whenever you have access to cheap tax deductible money you should use it. I imagine you have some type of consumer debt that is a higher cost than 4% and is not tax deductible. Long story short If I were to pay down any debt that would be the very last debt I paid down.

Loading replies...