Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago, 09/27/2016

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Andrew White
  • Lexington, KY
0
Votes |
3
Posts

2 Townhouse, 1 loan?

Andrew White
  • Lexington, KY
Posted

Hello,

I currently have contract to buy a duplex in Lexington, KY.  Two weeks into the loan/under writing process, the lender just told me the lot/structure is considered two townhouses, not a duplex (I confirmed he is correct per local PVA). 

Instead of one conventional loan, the lender now requires two separate loans (split total price) to purchase.  Downside is split single contract into two, double closing costs and increased mortgage insurance costs.

MY QUESTION:

Does this sound correct, or is the underwriter mistaken...Do multiple townhomes require their own individual loans for each single unit (even if apart of the same structure)?

Loading replies...