Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

153
Posts
39
Votes
Michael Healy
  • Investor
  • Great Barrington, MA
39
Votes |
153
Posts

100+ year old houses?

Michael Healy
  • Investor
  • Great Barrington, MA
Posted
I admit it: I love old houses, especially those built in the early 1900s. Yet I always hear savvy investor types talking about only investing in post 1990s houses or similar criteria. I know real estate investing is about, well, investing. But I wonder if anyone has been financially successful while pursuing older homes? Lead paint always seems to be a huge concern in these homes, as well as fuel efficiency. Perspectives from old home investors appreciated. Michael P.s this is relevant because I'm in contract on a multifamily built in early 1900s with lots of original detail, windows, etc. I know it's going to be a bear to restore and maintain but I can't help myself.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

38
Posts
28
Votes
Elizabeth Zieman
  • Investor
  • Ridgefield, CT
28
Votes |
38
Posts
Elizabeth Zieman
  • Investor
  • Ridgefield, CT
Replied

I'm an architect/investor in Fairfield County, CT, and I totally feel your love of older homes.  I have to admit, I sort/filter my property listings to 1880-1930.  I have credible professional reasons for this, and here goes:

Pre-1870, buildings are likely not stick-framed, will be framed post-and-beam.  The walls thicknesses will be a disaster when replacing doors and windows.  And nothing will be to code, so if you open up any wall be prepared to open your checkbook to whatever craziness the building inspector is in the mood for that day.

1870-1930 houses are incredibly solidly built.  Nothing present day comes close.  The framing is old-growth wood and structurally is double the density of present-day framing.  Literally double.  The exterior siding, if it is still lurking under the mold-inducing vinyl siding, allows the wall to breathe but at the same time rot-resistant.  The plaster finish on the interiors of walls just about eliminate any sound transmission.

Insulation is an issue, but if you can't insulate in the wall cavity, a layer of rigid foam on the exterior can offer quick payback.  For windows that are historically accurate, nothing beats Marvin.

The most heartbreaking thing that can happen is when an old house is stripped of it's interesting exterior trim and detail.  But it is getting easier and easier to match/copy exterior detailing using stock PVC, which paints nicely and will never rot.  I'm currently checking into a new company Intex which claims to be able to replicates and exterior trim/detail/molding/bracket at a competitive pricepoint.

Michael, or anyone else, don't hesitate to contact me about some ideas to preserve some of the unique and beautiful details of your property.  Good luck!

Loading replies...