Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

285
Posts
109
Votes
Jonathan Orr
  • Developer
  • Boise ID
109
Votes |
285
Posts

Seller financing with mailers

Jonathan Orr
  • Developer
  • Boise ID
Posted

I have started doing some mailers and I was talking with a friend who is working with a guy who is doing a lot of seller financing commercial deals.  It sounds very interesting, however I am looking to those that have done a lot of seller financing deals (no money down) to see how they structure it.

I know how seller financing works, however I want to know how you typically see the most success in deal structures. Do you find more success in getting a 1st then having the owner carry a 2nd?  OR would it be easier to try and have the existing 1st transferred over and the owner carry the remaining portion? any pros or cons would help

If there is any other ways you have done a seller finance deal, please let me know!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

800
Posts
228
Votes
Steve S.
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
228
Votes |
800
Posts
Steve S.
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Transferring existing 1st can be more of a hassle than anything. The loan company will scrutinize you just as much, if not more, than if you applied for a new loan from them. Assuming a loan is very tough. 

In carry back transactions things seems to work out better when it is in 2nd position. Lenders want first position (always), so give it to them so you can get the bulk financing you want.

Some sellers will carry back the full thing, or with a small down payment, but they are hard to find. If you're trying to do this then have a streamlined and detailed exit strategy so they understand how long they will still not have their money and how they will get it. If it is a fix or flip it tends to work out better.

Lastly, there are options out there in the world that make sense where you can borrow the funds and not deal with the carryback altogether. If I were you I would explore all possibilities and go the route that makes the most sense.

Remember... maximizing return and minimizing cost is always important, but actually getting the place to buy and flip or invest in so you can make the real money matters the most. I have seen so many people lose out on $100,000 ROI flips because they are trying to save 1% on a rate or 1% on fees. Their over indulgence to get the best deal on financing and save $500 cost them $100,000 in profit.

Best of luck.

Loading replies...