Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago, 01/25/2016

User Stats

9
Posts
0
Votes
Jennifer McCollum
  • Investor
  • Huntsville, AL
0
Votes |
9
Posts

Responsibility for determining and disclosing flood plain?

Jennifer McCollum
  • Investor
  • Huntsville, AL
Posted

This is Alabama - buyer beware state.

It looks like the investment property we purchased is in the "mandatory insurance" flood plain - 1% annual risk. FWIW, cash deal.  

When I worked with my realtor to write in contingencies, I had listed that the property must not be federally required to have flood insurance.

The buyer and her agent (sisters) stated it was NOT in a flood plain.  

When I purchased insurance, the agent did not mention it.

During the entire time of this 6 week process, it was not mentioned.  

However, when I pulled the mail from the mailbox, there was a letter from the city from November 2015 where the property was in the flood plain and the FEMA website also has it at high risk.

Other than the fact that it's a trust no one situation and we should have asked ourselves, who would have normally been responsible for verifying this information?

Loading replies...