Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago, 12/21/2015

User Stats

56
Posts
20
Votes
Nicholas B.
  • Finance, Credit, and Insurance
  • Northwestern, PA
20
Votes |
56
Posts

Loan term and negative cash flow - Struggling with the concept...

Nicholas B.
  • Finance, Credit, and Insurance
  • Northwestern, PA
Posted

Regarding small scale rental properties or I believe "buy and hold" is the term used around here (sorry, I'm new to all this).

I notice that a lot of investors mortgage properties for 10, 20, even 30 years - whatever it takes to produce a (sometimes barely) positive cash flow. It seems that a lot of them end up in a "one day, I'll be rich" scenario of waiting out the mortgage before they really have solid usable income from the rent checks. Maybe they put a couple bucks in their pocket, but in the mean time, they're paying thousands in interest and often run into difficult DTI problems when they go to finance something in their name.

Do people who have the disposable income ever intentionally enter a negative cash flow deal in order to get to the "I keep the rent $" phase sooner and save the interest? Or more importantly, why not?

I'll add an example in case I'm not really clear:
Let's assume an initial loan amount of $60,000, $3000 / year of taxes and insurance, and a rental income of $1200 / month analyzed over ten years. Assuming that repairs and maintenance will be paid out of pocket. Total income would be $144,000 minus the out of pocket expenses. Please bare with me for simplifying all of this to get to the point. 

  • If I take a 5 year HEL at 4.115%, P&I = $1108 + $250(T&I) = $1358 x 60 months is $81,480. Then another 5 years of tax & ins totaling $15,000. Total investment is 96,480, leaving an income of 47,520. For the first 5 years, I'll have to float $158 / month totaling $9,480, but the next 5 years, I'll have $950 of additional income totaling $57,000.
  • If I take a 10 year HEL at 5.365%, P&I = $647 + $250 = $897 x 120 mo is $107,640 total, leaving an income of $36,360. Each month, I'll have a positive income of $303, totaling the $36k.

Maybe I'm missing something. I guess I just wonder why I read so much about making "positive cash flow" leveraged deals, but nobody ever talks about just getting the thing paid off and then enjoying the income. This is something that I'm actually considering doing in the future, so feel free to save me from myself. Thanks!

Loading replies...