Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

66
Posts
17
Votes
Brian Tremaine
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
17
Votes |
66
Posts

How to evaluate a deal - principal payback?

Brian Tremaine
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
Posted

Hi All,

I'm questioning my approach after several decades, old dogs they say ....

I want to evaluate the purchase of a SFR. I normally account for my overall cash flow as rent minus expenses, where expenses are mortgage payment (prin & interest), insurance, taxes plus a reserve for miscellaneous.

In looking at a property near Hillo ($250k 3/2) with 20% down. This leads to a property I can rent for maybe $1200 but my cash-flow is negative at -$152. However, if I account for the fact I'm paying down principal  $263/mo my net is really a positive $111.

I already have a couple rentals near Hillo and I manage them myself from CA with tenants that are long-term stable.

Which way is the correct way to analyze this? Principal or not?

P.S. HI requires resident RE Brokers to manage short-term vacation rentals owned out-of-state but long-term non-vacation rentals don't fall under this rule.

Thanks for your advice

Loading replies...