Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3,975
Posts
2,728
Votes
Matt R.
  • Sherman Oaks, CA
2,728
Votes |
3,975
Posts

Are you investing in a dying state?

Matt R.
  • Sherman Oaks, CA
Posted

Are you purple or green? This map shows the net flow of personal interstate incomes. The top 3 income collectors are Florida, Texas and Arizona. If you could magically transport to your investments to another state...where would you go and why? 

thanks,

Matt

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

33
Posts
9
Votes
Wes Shive
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
9
Votes |
33
Posts
Wes Shive
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

I suspect the map/data is a bit too broad and unfocused for it to be very helpful in drawing any conclusions. I say this both because it is statewide and particularly because of the 10 year sample period.

For example, I'm in southern CA (LA and surrounding areas). Here, as with most parts of the country, prices went crazy during the boom to 2006 and then plummeted over the next couple years as the bubble burst, hitting troughs in 2009. Things traded sideways for the next few years. In the last couple years, some areas (ones saddled with a lot of bad loans that were hit the hardest) have doubled from their lows and areas that were more stable (generally nicer areas) have surpassed their 2006 highs.

As an investor, I correctly took advantage of this swing during the last several years and am continuing to see appreciation. And as a landlord, I didn't see much volatility in rental income. So it's hard for me see that CA's near-bottom ranking is an indicator of how one would do as a real estate investor.

One thought that I have is perhaps this map would be more useful if it gave a percent increase or decrease out of the state's total income. Absolute figures may lack a frame a reference so to speak for it to be very telling.

Loading replies...