Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago, 04/22/2014

User Stats

307
Posts
118
Votes
Michael Lemieux
  • Investor
  • Deerfield Beach Florida and Tupper Lake, N.Y.
118
Votes |
307
Posts

Selling small multi-family; w or w/o tenants?

Michael Lemieux
  • Investor
  • Deerfield Beach Florida and Tupper Lake, N.Y.
Posted

When selling a small multi-family property, let's say small sfh in front, duplex in back, would it be better to have tenants in place, or clean, new and empty?

User Stats

2,030
Posts
3,308
Votes
Anthony Gayden
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Omaha, NE
3,308
Votes |
2,030
Posts
Anthony Gayden
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Omaha, NE
Replied

As a buyer, I would prefer that it is 100% occupied, or close. That way I am experiencing cash flow from day 1 of ownership. Also, I will know what kind of rents the units can attract. When you see a pro-forma and an empty building, you have no clue how the building will perform or what kind of expenses it has.

The only exception to that would be if I was buying a distressed property that needed substantial work. It would be much easier to do the work with no tenants living there.

  • Anthony Gayden
  • Podcast Guest on Show #21
  • User Stats

    26
    Posts
    5
    Votes
    Karen Lee
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Wilmington, MA
    5
    Votes |
    26
    Posts
    Karen Lee
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Wilmington, MA
    Replied

    I closed on a three family last June. It was freshly renovated and without tenants. It rented quickly and I actually saw alot more cash flow than I had previously planned on when I purchased. If you buy a place fully rented, how long before you can increase rents due to leases or conditions?

    BiggerPockets logo
    Join Our Private Community for Passive Investors
    |
    BiggerPockets
    Get first-hand insights and real sponsor reviews from other investors

    User Stats

    535
    Posts
    253
    Votes
    Kimberly T.
    • Investor
    • Colorado Springs CO
    253
    Votes |
    535
    Posts
    Kimberly T.
    • Investor
    • Colorado Springs CO
    Replied

    Occupied is better, unless it needs major rehab work, as Anthony said. Many buyers will need rental agreements that they can show their lender in order to count that additional income to qualify for the loan, so it's better for them if there are already tenants with rental agreements in place. That said, some buyers may be looking to owner-occupy one unit, or to raise rents if your rents are a little below market, so having the tenants on month-to-month agreements provides the buyer with the most flexibility. If the buyer wants the tenants on leases, they can always require the tenants to sign the leases after closing escrow.

    User Stats

    8,326
    Posts
    4,342
    Votes
    Colleen F.
    Pro Member
    • Investor
    • Narragansett, RI
    4,342
    Votes |
    8,326
    Posts
    Colleen F.
    Pro Member
    • Investor
    • Narragansett, RI
    Replied

    Occupied if its livable and the tenants are paying rent. If the SF is likely to attract owner occupants it is might be ok if that is vacant. However don't hamper the sale with longer then a year lease. Sometimes people have the tenants sign extensions and it was just annoying that they did that with our last purchase. It made the leases a bit longer then I would have wanted and we could not raise the rent because of the existing lease

    Account Closed
    • Residential Real Estate Broker
    • Palo Alto, CA
    21
    Votes |
    49
    Posts
    Account Closed
    • Residential Real Estate Broker
    • Palo Alto, CA
    Replied

    If the tenants are paying at or above market rents and have leases with six or more months remaining, I would feature those tenants as a selling point. Most investors like immediate cash flow.

    User Stats

    307
    Posts
    118
    Votes
    Michael Lemieux
    • Investor
    • Deerfield Beach Florida and Tupper Lake, N.Y.
    118
    Votes |
    307
    Posts
    Michael Lemieux
    • Investor
    • Deerfield Beach Florida and Tupper Lake, N.Y.
    Replied

    Thanks all. @Kimberly T. & @Colleen F., hadn't thought of the owner occupied part. I don't think i'd live there but that doesn't mean somebody wouldn't. The neighbors do.