Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 3 months ago,

User Stats

192
Posts
346
Votes
Sammy Lyon
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
346
Votes |
192
Posts

Why would a seller pay a buyer’s agent??

Sammy Lyon
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I've been thinking about this one a lot as a realtor having to have these convos with my clients, and wanted to break it down with some simple numbers.

You may have heard about the new law changes in the real estate industry about commissions and compensation.

Some home sellers might be asking, “why would I want to pay a buyer’s agent??”

Well, here’s my simple answer - you can net more money if you do!

Sounds contradictory, but this is how that works. (Hint: it has to do with how "leverage" works in real estate!)

Let’s say you are selling your house. Let’s use a $1M sale price, for easy numbers.

The buyer plans to put 20% down to buy your home. That’s $200,000 for down payment.

Pretend there are no closing costs, etc, so they just have the $200k that they’ve been eagerly saving for years to buy their $1M house.

This is their leverage (the beauty of real estate!) - with only $200k, they can buy a $1M house because they can borrow the rest from the bank.

Let’s say the buyer’s agent is asking for 2.5% of the sale price. That’s $25,000 in buyer agent compensation.

Now, if you the Seller pay the buyer’s agent, you will net $975k.

($1,000,000 - $25,000 = $975,000)

As a seller you probably have a listing agent to pay too on top of your transfer taxes, closing costs, etc, so the net is less than that obviously, but we are just focusing on the buyer agent compensation piece of it right now for easy numbers!

But if you DON’T pay the buyer agent, the Buyer has to pay them.

So now instead of $200k to put down on your house, the buyer only has $175k left for down payment.

($200,000 - $25,000 = $175,000)

Guess, what – now the buyer who was going to pay you $1M for your house can only pay you $875k, since they had to pay out of pocket for their buyer’s agent.

Why? With $175k, their buying power is now only $875,000 with 20% down.

($175,000 / 20% = $875,000)

Of course, the buyer can put less than 20% down and pay private mortgage insurance, but let’s say they really want to put 20% down.

As a seller, you have now reduced the pool of buyers who can pay $1M for your home since the buyer needs to save more money to reach a $1M purchase price.

So, would you rather make $875k and “save” money on commission, or make $975k and just pay their agent?

Up to you! :)

What do you think of this logic...?

Loading replies...