Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

45
Posts
12
Votes
Sam Liu
  • Investor
  • Santa Clara, CA
12
Votes |
45
Posts

Occupied REO in SF

Sam Liu
  • Investor
  • Santa Clara, CA
Posted

Has anyone here dealt with occupied REOs in San Francisco? I'm curious about how challenging it is to take ownership of these properties given the city's tenant-friendly policies. Any insights or experiences would be greatly appreciated!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

919
Posts
719
Votes
Alan F.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • California
719
Votes |
919
Posts
Alan F.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • California
Replied
Quote from @Sam Liu:
Quote from @Alan F.:
Quote from @Sam Liu:

Has anyone here dealt with occupied REOs in San Francisco? I'm curious about how challenging it is to take ownership of these properties given the city's tenant-friendly policies. Any insights or experiences would be greatly appreciated!


 Personally I wouldn't buy any property occupied, I'm interested in the asset itself and will decide how I operate said asset.

What is the main reason that you wouldn't buy any occupied property? 

 CalifCalifornia is so tennant friendly that I lose control of an asset that I purchased

If I'm going to rent it the lease agreement wasn't of my doing.

If I'm flipping to sell (my primary focus) there's someone living in my construction site.

Bottom line, I'm buying a house, not a Tennant, squatter or whatever. Over the years you'll decide which battles you'd like to fight.

I approach active investing like a business, 1 of many S.O.P.'a are a vacant house, the minute its mine I change out all locks and secure the premise.

Loading replies...