Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

62
Posts
18
Votes
Alexander King
  • New Haven, CT
18
Votes |
62
Posts

Flood Zone Issues & properties without a c/o

Alexander King
  • New Haven, CT
Posted

Biggest bit of info I learned that saved a deal for me when I purchased a property in an A/E Flood Zone which had no certificate of occupancy was to immediately have the property reassessed. A/E Flood Zone is the worst flood zone and FEMA, a gov agency, limits the amount of money that can be input into these properties for insurance reasons. They allow an owner to spend only 50% of the property appraised value into the property for your first 5 years of ownership. After 5 years the input allowance goes back to zero and the owner can start spending again. To clear a c/o permits need to be pulled showing repair numbers in order to bring the property back up to approved conditions. If town officials don't believe the repair budget will fit into that 50% appraised figure, or that there isn't enough allowance to cover unexpected breaks within 5 years they may not issue a building permit because theirs fears of an audited by FEMA. Reassessing the property should increase the value and give the rehab budget more breathing room, or else even more money would need to be spent raising the first floor above the flood level. Anyone else run into problems with this crazy rule?