Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

74
Posts
41
Votes
Dylan Thomas
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Alabama
41
Votes |
74
Posts

Seller Financed 2nd Positions for 100% Financing

Dylan Thomas
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Alabama
Posted

I'm curious to hear what others in the group have to say about creative financing options in today's market with higher interest rates. This is geared towards commercial properties. 

I've been talking to brokers and agents across the country to gauge the willingness of their sellers to finance a portion of their asking price. Obviously, a 2nd position of 20-30% would benefit buyers in that they would have to come up with little to nothing down. They would also benefit from an interest rate on the carried portion that is most likely lower than the average market rate. 

However, it also seems like a benefit to a seller because they would be able to sell their property much more quickly by adopting a more creative stance. The property would, of course, have to have a high cap rate, such as 8%+, to make sense for a buyer, but depending on the balloon period, the seller wouldn't have to carry the debt for too long. 

I've noticed that there are quite a few sellers willing to do this in order to facilitate a deal. So I have a few questions:

For anyone, what do you generally think of this type of deal structure?

For buyers, is this a strategy you would be interested in adopting?

For seller, would this be something you would feel comfortable with for your own property?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

42,850
Posts
63,203
Votes
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Lender
  • Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
63,203
Votes |
42,850
Posts
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Lender
  • Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
Replied

is this assuming your taking title sub to the first..  If your getting a new loan I suspect that will be an issue with the first position lender. 

business profile image
JLH Capital Partners

Loading replies...