Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago, 05/30/2023

User Stats

74
Posts
41
Votes
Dylan Thomas
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Alabama
41
Votes |
74
Posts

Seller Financed 2nd Positions for 100% Financing

Dylan Thomas
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Alabama
Posted

I'm curious to hear what others in the group have to say about creative financing options in today's market with higher interest rates. This is geared towards commercial properties. 

I've been talking to brokers and agents across the country to gauge the willingness of their sellers to finance a portion of their asking price. Obviously, a 2nd position of 20-30% would benefit buyers in that they would have to come up with little to nothing down. They would also benefit from an interest rate on the carried portion that is most likely lower than the average market rate. 

However, it also seems like a benefit to a seller because they would be able to sell their property much more quickly by adopting a more creative stance. The property would, of course, have to have a high cap rate, such as 8%+, to make sense for a buyer, but depending on the balloon period, the seller wouldn't have to carry the debt for too long. 

I've noticed that there are quite a few sellers willing to do this in order to facilitate a deal. So I have a few questions:

For anyone, what do you generally think of this type of deal structure?

For buyers, is this a strategy you would be interested in adopting?

For seller, would this be something you would feel comfortable with for your own property?

Loading replies...