Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
No Jo
  • Seattle, WA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

What rent would support a 200k home (on average)

No Jo
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

I'm currently evaluating properties in the suburbs of Seattle and am having trouble finding anything that cash flows.

The best situation i'm finding is a SFR for 180k that will rent for 1600. So far my search has been focused in Everett since that's the only place where market rents come close to covering the mortgage. is there a price break for more expensive homes in the greater Seattle / Everett area? I'm looking at either a SFR or 2-4 units and can afford up to 400k as I need owner occ financing.

Using the above numbers (180k loan that rents for 1600) and assuming a $1200 mortgage payment I get a monthly cash flow of -400 and using the 2% rule i'm coming up with a required monthly rent of 3600 to support a relatively cheap home in a B- / C neighborhood.

Am I misinterpreting the calcs or is the situation really that bleak for 1-4 unit properties in this area?

thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,152
Posts
2,657
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,657
Votes |
3,152
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

You have to understand the 2% rule is only accurate/applicable at about the 25-75K range. 50K is about ideal and as you go closer to 25K you need to be higher than 2% and as you go closer to 75% you most likely will need to dip slightly below it. Looking for rental using the 2% as a guideline on a property that doesn't fit the "model" won't work.

Think about it like this: 2 homes both about 1200 SF and both 3/2, one in a expensive market and one in a much cheaper market lets say 40K and 175K price for each.

The cost of a new A/C unit for both will be similar. Maybe in the expensive market it will be 10-20% more because of higher labor costs but the materials and equipment will be the same price or nearly the same price. So as a percentage of gross rents the replacement will eat up more on the cheap home than the expensive. This is why you need to understand the true costs in your area in order to truly analyze what you are looking at.

Another area that this can easily be seen in in property taxes. Two properties that are the same price but one is in a city that has taxes of 4K/yr and one is in an area that has taxes of only 1K/yr. That is a difference of almost 250/mo on your expenses. So if the one rents for 1100/mo and the other for 1300/mo you may be better off buying the 1100/mo rental since the true difference in CF compared to the other home is not -200/mo it is +50/mo.

Loading replies...