Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
5
Votes

Multi-Fam Properties with missing CofO

Posted

Hi BP!

I am curious what are the real world considerations that come with properties lacking a CofO.

Has anyone bought an investment property w/o a CofO and what was involved in obtaining one? 

thanks in advance 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

219
Posts
174
Votes
Kevin Paulk
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
174
Votes |
219
Posts
Kevin Paulk
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
Replied

If your buying the property here in NYC and it was built before 1938, there a good chance that the property was not required to have a CofO unless later alterations changed its use, egress or occupancy. If you require proof of a building’s legal use – and it’s exempt from the CO requirement – contact the Department’s borough office where the property is located to request a Letter of No objection. 

  • Kevin Paulk
  • Loading replies...