Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

31
Posts
44
Votes
Kyle O'Donnell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
44
Votes |
31
Posts

how to assume a mortgage with less risk than a subject to

Kyle O'Donnell
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
Posted

Subject-to means subject to the existing loan. This means having the home owner sign the deed of the house over to you, with the promise that you will make their mortgage payment.  However, the lender is not made aware of this change.  This allows us to retain their low interest rate.  

I've heard horror stories about subject to.  For example, the original owner may come calling to wipe out their house debt when their debt:income sucks and threatening to make lender aware of changes to claim the due on sale clause.  Is there a safer way to buy and home and assume the original mortgage terms?  

Loading replies...