Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
4
Votes
Gabriel C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Pomona, CA
4
Votes |
22
Posts

What would you do if you had, $60k, $100k, or $150k?

Gabriel C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Pomona, CA
Posted

I’m looking for some perspectives from seasoned investors who could offer some thoughts on long-distance investing under these scenarios.

What would you if you had $60k/$100k/$150k and:

1. needed to invest hands-off (personally could not manage/could not renovate)

2. preferred short-term rentals (you would like to visit in the summer understanding summer is a popular rental time in some regions); long term is fine though

3. did not care too much about location

If your advice differs (e.g., markets, property type, etc.) for each dollar amount, please share. I’m also curious about your market sentiments.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,769
Posts
3,438
Votes
Evan Polaski
#3 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Cincinnati, OH
3,438
Votes |
3,769
Posts
Evan Polaski
#3 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Cincinnati, OH
Replied

@Gabriel C., what is your definition of hands off? Any direct ownership is not 100% hands off, then again neither is a syndication or choosing a REIT, but still a bit different.

Direct ownership means, at minimum, you are an asset manager, managing your management company.  You will still be signing off on certain decisions, will still have book keeping to do from time to time, etc.  You will also be the one interviewing new management companies when your current one isn't working out.

Syndications and REITs: you need to vet sponsors or monitor which REIT(s) have the best outlook. And then execute the investment.

In either option above, you should 100% care about the location. I am assuming you mean you will buy in any city, but what makes a good short term rental is often very different than what makes a good long term rental. STR guests want convenience and easy to find, since they likely don't know the area. STRs are effectively hotels.

Long term rentals people typically want neighborhoods and schools.  

And as for market, if you own directly, you will likely be traveling there at least once a year, so my suggestion is always for a place that is a direct and inexpensive flight from you.  

To answer your question, for all three probably syndication. Maybe at $150k a STR in an area I personally like, and has strong tourist appeal. Mountains of Gatlinberg or Asheville. Maybe into Scottsdale or something. Essentially, places where the lower amounts won't get you a downpayment for a second home.

  • Evan Polaski
  • [email protected]
  • 513-638-9799
  • Loading replies...