Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

105
Posts
53
Votes
Keith Meyer
  • San Diego, CA
53
Votes |
105
Posts

1% Rule for Mobile Home Parks

Keith Meyer
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I'm currently evaluating two mobile home parks for purchase. I love the 1% Rule (Monthly Rent / Property Purchase Price) for SFH and MFH, and am wondering if there are any thoughts on how this applies to a mobile home park investment, where the chattel arrangement applies. Mobile home parks owners typically rent the land to tenants, who own the home on top of the land (chattel). So our income is primarily from lot rent.

I've seen recent figures indicating that average lot rent in the US is around $325-$350 monthly per lot. I'd say a lot of parks I've seen sold recently are in the $30k - $40k per pad range on average, so the 1% Rule seems to hold up fairly well. I'm just wondering if there are other considerations that should be factored in, such as incorporating the depreciable asset of the apartment structure in MFH versus mobile home parks being primarily land, etc. Since both asset classes are commercial property valued on the Income Approach, I'm thinking the 1% Rule should be a good metric for the most part.   

Loading replies...