Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
0
Votes
John Kim
  • Los Angeles, CA
0
Votes |
8
Posts

Help with first mobile home park

John Kim
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I'm currently looking a 39 lot only mobile home park in the west coast and looking for any advice/help on making a decision on it. The asking price is $850,000. From what I analyzed so far, it seems like a decent deal but I would like to see what you guys think. Here’s some details of it:

Number of MH Lots: 39

Built: 1930

Park Owned Home: 0

Structures on Park: 1 (Laundry+Office)

Water: City (Included in Rent)

Trash: City (Included in Rent)

Sewer: City (Included in Rent)

Total Occupancy: 24/39

Avg rent: $385 (based on current month)

Here’s some history of the MPH I found:

7/16/2008 $1,850,000 Sold
6/1/2008 $1,700,000 Sold
4/9/2004 $761,000 Sold
2/24/2017 $1,500,000 Asking Price
5/23/2017 $1,140,000 Asking Price
?? $975,000 Asking Price
7/13/2017 $900,000 Asking Price
10/18/2017 $850,000 Asking Price

Here are the numbers based on the agent ($9525/month rental income as of today):

Total yearly rent (based on 24/39 lots rented): $114,300

Expenses (agent estimate): $30,000

Management fee: $19,200

The agent said the current owner never kept good accounting and has had some trouble managing the park. He did provide me with the current rent roll, 1 year bank statements, water/sewer/gas/tax bills.

Here are the numbers based on the bank statements for 1 year:

Total income: $82816

Total expenses: $75967

The park isn’t making much profit but if the occupancy stays at its current rate or increases, it seems like a good deal to me. Am I missing anything? The park price keeps dropping but nobody is biting, is there something I'm not seeing? Oh, the agent mentioned that they took over management of the park back in Aug and am actively increasing occupancy. He said he would like to continue as the property manager and their fees are 6%. He also said average rent can be increased to $450.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,830
Posts
3,390
Votes
Bill F.
  • Investor
  • Boston, MA
3,390
Votes |
1,830
Posts
Bill F.
  • Investor
  • Boston, MA
Replied

@John Kim Something is not right. Just going off the data you have given, the park is running a 91% expense ratio. That is huge! So lets wish away the issue with the park that @Account Closed pointed out and I agree is probably there and value the park. 

Assuming you are buying this for the MHP and not its highest and best use. With a reported NOI $6,849 and at a 8 Cap, the park is worth $85K. Not realistic at all for the west coast. Lets say you come in and lower the expense ratio to 60% and increase the rent to $450. Park is worth $615k. Still over $234k away from asking.

What would you have to do to get the park to the asking price of $850k? Raise the rents to $450, lower expenses to 57%, and get the park occupancy up to 100% when valued at a 10 cap.  The park price is already reflects the increased operational efficiencies, raised rents, and in-fill that have yet to be done. In other words, you'd be paying them for the privilege of doing a whole lot of work that the owners have not done. 

This could devolve into a discussion about valuing parks on current performance or future potential, but anyway you look at it the park is overvalued for the amount of work needed.

Other side of the coin, this park could be worth a lot. If you get it 100% full, bill back utilities, and assuming lot rents rise in the time this takes, the park could be worth around $1.6M at a 8 Cap. The only question is how much time and capital will it take to make that situation a reality.

Loading replies...