Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Contractors
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

162
Posts
43
Votes
David S.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
43
Votes |
162
Posts

Contractor License legit?

David S.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
Posted

While checking out a roofer to do some roof maintenance on a flat tar and gravel roof, I discovered that the license number that he Gave me belongs to a roofer in Los Angeles instead of San Francisco where we are located. This roofer in San Francisco said the license is his partners although these guys do not seem to work under any corporate entity.

Should I be concerned about this?

Can 2 self employed partners work under one license?

Both of them appear to be under the radar of review sites like Yelp. I have also asked for references but he has not been forthcoming except to say that he can show me a lot of contracts whose value is much more than the small job he is quoting me.

As I write this, I think I should pass on this guy.

What do you all think?

Loading replies...