Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

363
Posts
214
Votes
Clayton Silva
  • Lender
  • California
214
Votes |
363
Posts

Local vs National

Clayton Silva
  • Lender
  • California
Posted

I see a lot of people say they want to go local, and while I understand the sentiment, one of the biggest myths I see perpetuated in lending, or insurance, or appraisers, etc. is that local is better.  There are definitely pros and cons to each so I figured I would just lay out a few benefits and personal thoughts: 

Small banks/brokerages:

Pros:

- Some regional knowledge of the market

- Possibility of more creative lending guidelines with bank specific programs

- Sometimes they have competitive rates for their area

Cons: 

- weak balance sheet (more strict on some guidelines, no wiggle room, inability to be flexible or grant exceptions because they cannot afford to hold less than perfect loans)

- Can't scale with clients to different markets

- Usually limits exposure to individual investors (they don't want one investor to be too big of a portion of their balance sheet)

- Lack of experience with multiple solutions (tend to have 2 or 3 loan products they sell and are too niche to provide tailored solutions)

Large banks/brokerages:

Pros:

- Large compliance departments that understand individual market guidelines (typically each state has specific lending guidelines that augment the national baseline)

- Ability to scale into multiple markets with same lender (licensed in many states)

- Impossible for individual investors to "outgrow" a large bank's balance sheet (not concerned with one investor's concentration)

- More lending solutions available for different scenarios

- Often comparable or better rates given the game is volume based

Cons:

- Can be more difficult to get fast responses if the bank/brokerage does not have good follow up systems in place (or if the underwriting/processing staff gets overwhelmed)

- Bad large banks can feel less like a relationship and more like a cog in a factory (less personal)

Overall, I have worked from both and worked with both as a loan officer, branch manager, and as an investor/client myself.  I have found myself defaulting toward larger, national banks/brokerages because of their resources, product offerings, and potential.  

Feel free to share your experiences!

  • Clayton Silva
  • [email protected]
  • 209-329-8567
  • Loading replies...