Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 5 months ago,

User Stats

349
Posts
210
Votes
Clayton Silva
Lender
Pro Member
  • Lender
  • California
210
Votes |
349
Posts

Local vs National

Clayton Silva
Lender
Pro Member
  • Lender
  • California
Posted

I see a lot of people say they want to go local, and while I understand the sentiment, one of the biggest myths I see perpetuated in lending, or insurance, or appraisers, etc. is that local is better.  There are definitely pros and cons to each so I figured I would just lay out a few benefits and personal thoughts: 

Small banks/brokerages:

Pros:

- Some regional knowledge of the market

- Possibility of more creative lending guidelines with bank specific programs

- Sometimes they have competitive rates for their area

Cons: 

- weak balance sheet (more strict on some guidelines, no wiggle room, inability to be flexible or grant exceptions because they cannot afford to hold less than perfect loans)

- Can't scale with clients to different markets

- Usually limits exposure to individual investors (they don't want one investor to be too big of a portion of their balance sheet)

- Lack of experience with multiple solutions (tend to have 2 or 3 loan products they sell and are too niche to provide tailored solutions)

Large banks/brokerages:

Pros:

- Large compliance departments that understand individual market guidelines (typically each state has specific lending guidelines that augment the national baseline)

- Ability to scale into multiple markets with same lender (licensed in many states)

- Impossible for individual investors to "outgrow" a large bank's balance sheet (not concerned with one investor's concentration)

- More lending solutions available for different scenarios

- Often comparable or better rates given the game is volume based

Cons:

- Can be more difficult to get fast responses if the bank/brokerage does not have good follow up systems in place (or if the underwriting/processing staff gets overwhelmed)

- Bad large banks can feel less like a relationship and more like a cog in a factory (less personal)

Overall, I have worked from both and worked with both as a loan officer, branch manager, and as an investor/client myself.  I have found myself defaulting toward larger, national banks/brokerages because of their resources, product offerings, and potential.  

Feel free to share your experiences!

  • Clayton Silva
  • [email protected]
  • 209-329-8567
  • Loading replies...