Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mortgage Brokers & Lenders
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

28
Posts
9
Votes
Jared H.
  • Investor
  • Klamath Falls, OR
9
Votes |
28
Posts

Different score models used for joint mortgage application?

Jared H.
  • Investor
  • Klamath Falls, OR
Posted

I'm applying for a second mortgage with my wife as a primary residence with a direct lender. I remember on our first mortgage (using a broker), our credit score report was given back showing the same credit score models being used for each of us and reflected pretty accurately. However, I just received the reports back for this application with a direct lender and it seems that the models used are different for each of us, which mine displays slighter lower of all models that I was able to access (Credit Karma: Transunion, Experian and AMEX: FICO). My wife's score displays significantly lower than I could access on any of those sites which would definitely result in a higher interest rate. The model also states serious delinquency negatively affecting credit score and there are no delinquencies on her credit from any reports I'm able to access and I know there shouldn't be because I help manage her credit/finances.

The models used were Transunion/FICO Classic (04) for her, and for me Experian/FAIR, ISAAC (VER. 2)

Is this normal practice? I'm confused as to why a lender would pull different models for different individuals on the same application unless it were to find a reason to lower the median score to offer higher rates (which sounds strange, considering how rates are plenty high right now and could result in DTI denials). If a broker is a direct lender, should I be trying multiple direct lender brokers or is that unethical to make multiple people work for only one to get paid in the end? Or does this only applies to normal brokers and not direct lenders?

I'm trying to learn as much as I can through our second time around and definitely don't want to be stepping on any toes here.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,893
Posts
2,329
Votes
Caroline Gerardo
  • Lender
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
2,329
Votes |
2,893
Posts
Caroline Gerardo
  • Lender
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
Replied

Mortgage credit reports are not that similar to the consumer one you pulled at credit Karma. Lenders use the lowest middle mortgage score of the two of you. Ask them to send you the complete report. Each of you has three scores, her middle being the lowest is the one used for pricing.

"direct lender" what exactly do they mean by this advertisement?

You can provide the full mortgage report to another lender and have them price out the loan.

You lender should have taken thirty minutes or an hour to review with you your credit reports in detail. "serious delinquency" is noted on mortgage report?

If your lender hasn't dived into explaining your scores feel free to email me and call me to explain, no obligation. 

Each tradeline history has bars that go back to the date opened. Are all the bars black? 

Loading replies...