Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
7
Votes
Ilya Plugovoy
7
Votes |
10
Posts

Buy first investment property before buying a primary residence?

Ilya Plugovoy
Posted

Hello All. The past few months I have been doing much research in rental properties and wish to buy one soon. I currently live in the Twin Cities but am looking to relocate to San Diego area if all goes well with my job transfer. The transfer may take a year or two. I currently own a home and if I sell, and the prices remain as they are, I would end up having about 150k. I'm seeking advice on either buying my own home in California first, and then pulling out a HELOC for an investment property, or should I buy an investment property first? The prices are quite steep in CA so I would love some insight from the locals there. I've been in MN for 3.5 years now, and it is much too cold to stay here any longer.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,053
Posts
6,986
Votes
Dan H.
#2 General Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
6,986
Votes |
6,053
Posts
Dan H.
#2 General Real Estate Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
Replied

I would not suggest you buy in San Diego until you move here.  Here is some of the rationale:

  • rent risk has never been higher in San Diego.  We received all of our LTR rents, but I know San Diego LLs who have not.
  • price risk: No one knows what the virus will do to local prices, but my prediction is a decline of between 5% and 20% (I know it is a big window).
  • OOS.  Managing OOS rentals has more risk than in state.
  • Currently impossible to evict a bad tenant.
  • Initial cash flow: Most San Diego RE with high LTV is initially cash flow negative as a rental. It usually changes fairly quickly. Over the last 7 years San Diego average rent has increased over $100/month annually. However, with the virus and potential home values declining I am less certain of rent increases than I was 2 months ago. Without rent increases, the negative cash flow takes longer to turn to positive cash flow.

I suspect that I would also not invest in the twin Cities if I were only staying a year or two.  Here is the Rationale:

  • OOS.  Managing OOS rentals have more risk than locals.
  • Price to sell.  5% to 6% RE commissions. 2% to 4% other associated costs.
  • Rent risk.  See above.
  • Value risk.  See above.
  • Currently impossible to evict a bad tenant.
  • Buy n hold is a long term play.  1 or 2 years does not qualify.

I would look for other liquid investment options. When you move to San Diego maybe rent for a short while then house hack a detached duplex or a property with an ADU. A detached duplex is challenging to discern that it is a duplex. Most ADUs are new and therefore nice. ADUs are also available in higher class areas than duplexes which for the most part are in C areas with a few in lower B areas.

Good luck

  • Dan H.
  • Loading replies...