Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Ryan Barnes
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Rental vs. Stocks ROI Question!

Ryan Barnes
Posted

I would LOVE to hear all of your investing perspectives and opinions on this... I have calculated the ROIs of a buying a rental property versus simply buying into the SP500 and sitting back for 30 years.

Rental Property Analysis:

Initial Cash investment - $45,000

Purchase price of $200,000 on 20 year term

Cash Flow neutral for loan term of 20 years.

Cash Flow positive for remaining 10 years. 

30 Year Approximate Net Profit = $110,000 Cash Flow + $300,000 Equity

ROI = ($410k / $45k) or 911%

Stock Market Analysis:

Initial Cash investment - $45,000

Purchase shares in SP500 Index Fund

30 Year Approximate Net Profit assuming 10% growth rate = $847,683

ROI = ($847,683 / $45k) or 1883%

Am I missing something? Does this all come down to the more philosophical and/or stress tolerance aspects of buying stock versus tangible property? Because it seems like from a strictly numerical approach the "better" strategy is to just buy stocks.

Loading replies...