Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Mary Blanco
  • New to Real Estate
  • CA (california)
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Do I need an LLC per house or just one LLC?

Mary Blanco
  • New to Real Estate
  • CA (california)
Posted

I'm looking to get started in an LLC for the two rental homes, I currently have. However, I'm trying to research which option is most beneficial. Do I create an LLC per home or one LLC for both homes ?

Looking for input ....

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

10
Posts
8
Votes
Nathan Biller
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Grand Rapids, MI
8
Votes |
10
Posts
Nathan Biller
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Grand Rapids, MI
Replied

First, I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not offering legal advice only explaining how I made my decision! While I'm sure there will be lots of people that disagree with me, I just invest in my own name. I read all the books that suggest one LLC per property. Warren Buffett says that you should never ask a barber if you need a haircut, and I noticed that most of the authors of those books had either esquire or J.D. after their names!

Having one LLC per property is likely the best way to minimize your legal liability. However, that comes at a trade-off of hassle and money. So, as with most things in life, the "right" answer is "it depends". How much do you value limiting legal liability compared to your time? In Michigan, it costs $50 to file for an LLC and then $25/year. In California, I think that's $70 upfront and then $800/year/LLC (again, you'd need to consult a licensed, practicing attorney in CA to confirm what I just googled about California). Then, in order to make sure your corporate veil can't be pierced you'd need to maintain independent bank accounts for each LLC and sign different management agreements for each LLC you manage with your PMs. Any co-mingling of funds would allow a good lawyer to break through all your hard work :( I found out that when I wanted to refinance the bank wouldn't allow me to do it when my LLC owned the property, so I had to quit-claim the property to myself, sign the refinancing docs, and then quitclaim it back to the LLC all while paying filing fees each time. Plus there's also the potential risk that a bank *could* call your loan because most mortgages these days have a "due on transfer" clause. The bankers I've spoken with say that in practice this rarely happens, but they *legally could* if they wanted. So for me, the additional hassle wasn't worth the benefits. You might decide that you like an LLC but not enough to have one for every single property. I'm curious to learn what you decide to do, and I'm looking forward to reading what others recommend too :)

Loading replies...