First, I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not offering legal advice only explaining how I made my decision! While I'm sure there will be lots of people that disagree with me, I just invest in my own name. I read all the books that suggest one LLC per property. Warren Buffett says that you should never ask a barber if you need a haircut, and I noticed that most of the authors of those books had either esquire or J.D. after their names!
Having one LLC per property is likely the best way to minimize your legal liability. However, that comes at a trade-off of hassle and money. So, as with most things in life, the "right" answer is "it depends". How much do you value limiting legal liability compared to your time? In Michigan, it costs $50 to file for an LLC and then $25/year. In California, I think that's $70 upfront and then $800/year/LLC (again, you'd need to consult a licensed, practicing attorney in CA to confirm what I just googled about California). Then, in order to make sure your corporate veil can't be pierced you'd need to maintain independent bank accounts for each LLC and sign different management agreements for each LLC you manage with your PMs. Any co-mingling of funds would allow a good lawyer to break through all your hard work :( I found out that when I wanted to refinance the bank wouldn't allow me to do it when my LLC owned the property, so I had to quit-claim the property to myself, sign the refinancing docs, and then quitclaim it back to the LLC all while paying filing fees each time. Plus there's also the potential risk that a bank *could* call your loan because most mortgages these days have a "due on transfer" clause. The bankers I've spoken with say that in practice this rarely happens, but they *legally could* if they wanted. So for me, the additional hassle wasn't worth the benefits. You might decide that you like an LLC but not enough to have one for every single property. I'm curious to learn what you decide to do, and I'm looking forward to reading what others recommend too :)