Starting Out
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Laura Rose's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/78558/1621415381-avatar-lilabean.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
subject to loan or new financing?
Does anyone have any advise on purchasing 5 unit rental via purchasing existing LLC and subject to existing loan (obviously the lender could call the loan if discovered) - saves transfer/recording fees for seller/buyer now and variable rate based on 12-month treasury currently around 3%. I would have to refinance as guarantor within 3 years (and then pay recording taxes anyway) Prepayment penalty has since passed but technically bank could assess transfer penalty when called.
Versus, set up new LLC with myself as guarantor right now (local bank), fixed rate 6%, adjusts every 3 yrs amortized for 25 years 1% origination fee now no prepayment penalty and no fees when the rate is subject to change every 3 years (will have loan committment Monday). I plan on keeping this for quite some time - fully rented and I leaning toward taking what I know and can count on right now (new loan) versus subject to and not knowing exactly what could happen in next 3 years. Any thoughts/suggestions?
Most Popular Reply
![Jon Holdman's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/67/1621345305-avatar-wheatie.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
When you get a purchase money loan from a bank, they will use the purchase price or the apprised value, whichever is lower, as the "value". Their loan amount is based on that value and their maximum LTV requirement. So, if you manage to buy a building that's worth, say, $1.5 million for $1 million, and the bank will do a maximum of 70% LTV, they will only loan you $700K.
OTOH, if you've owned a property for at least a year and you do a refi, the bank will use an appraised value as the "value". So, if you own the property for three years, as Laura proposes, and the property still appraises for $1.5 million, the bank might loan you $1.05 million. Now this will be tougher if you're taking cash out, but not so tough if you're just paying off another loan.
Using my example numbers, if the loan balance is $1 million, and Laura buys the property subject to (or, better, can assume that loan) the existing loan, then she would have no cash out of pocket. She really is buying at this point, including paying any transfer taxes. Three years from now, it appraises for $1.5 million, she does a refi (no change of ownership, so no new transfer taxes) and pays off the existing loan. Now she has a loan in her own name and has put little money into the deal.
Now, that only works if the value is there. If the property is only worth $1 million and the current outstanding loan is $1 million, its not such a good deal. It might be OK, if its generating a lot of cash flow, but there's no equity. When she goes to refi it its still worth just $1 million, she will have to bring cash to the table to complete the refi.