Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

61
Posts
2
Votes
Bruce M.
  • Flipper
  • Philadelphia, PA
2
Votes |
61
Posts

Multiple companies a conflict of interest?

Bruce M.
  • Flipper
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

Hello all. Here is my prob. I want to start a company for buy and hold and possibly flipping properties, once the market gets better. The 2 people in charge of this company will be me and my sister....Let's call it Company A. I also want to do investments with my wife a few years down the road and we'll call that Company B. My sister does not
want to form Company A if Company B has a strong possibility of happening. What do you all think? Is she in the right?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,705
Posts
3,450
Votes
Chris Martin
  • Investor
  • Willow Spring, NC
3,450
Votes |
5,705
Posts
Chris Martin
  • Investor
  • Willow Spring, NC
Replied

While I don't have a lot of information to go from, you state "...the main reason for doing 2 entities is because my wife and sister's opinions vary and I didn't want any bickering between the 2".

You can experience conflict contention on multiple fronts... like property selection, your management time, capital contributions, asset resource allocation, etc. I understand your sister's concern since as a member of Company A, your (future) involvement in Company B may impact your contribution to Company A. That's probably why she says any RE purchases "...should be purchased via the LLC we create...". I find this too restrictive, but rooted in her sense that Company B will drain resources from Company A.

There are ways to eliminate conflict and contention. For instance in property selection, since their opinions vary, define the target properties in enough detail to avoid Company A and Company B competing in the same 'space'. An easy example: my LLC is (by operating agreement) generally prohibited from buying property built before 1978. There would be no property selection conflict if I were to also be a manager of an LLC that exclusively buys LBP remediation projects. If you can define the member's roles in each of the other potential conflict areas (e.g. management time, capital contributions, asset resource allocation(s), etc.), your sister may realize that Company B, if it ever exists, may not impact Company A. As you know, the operating agreement spells out a lot of this stuff. It is a difficult task, but worth the effort to make Company A and Company B successful.

Loading replies...