Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

20
Posts
5
Votes
Julian Hicks
  • Southern California
5
Votes |
20
Posts

Is it a bad idea to MLO an out of state property?

Julian Hicks
  • Southern California
Posted

I've recently been looking into purchasing property using the Master Lease Option method. I currently reside in Southern California where, as you probably know, Real Estate prices are sky high. I do plan on exercising the option to buy when the lease term is up, but I don't want to buy in SoCal. Neighboring states such as Arizona and Nevada offer much better investment opportunities for me. What are the dangers of leasing an out of state property? Is it just too risky?

Loading replies...