Starting Out
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 14 years ago,
Boston area: A landlord investor's no-man's-land?
Let me explain the thought process...
I've spent the better part of 6 months pouring over the market in an area near my current residence. The typical family 4b/2ba ranges from ~$400 to $550k AVR in the area I've been researching.
2b/1ba rents in these multis fall mostly between $1100 and $1500
So let me walk myself through the math and someone can tell me where I've gone wrong:
Assume best case scenario:
$400k ARV
$0 repairs needed
People here seem to think that anything above 75% ARV is a non-starter. Well I've never seen a $300k multi anywhere near the area I'm talking about, but lets assume one exists...
So I'm in for $300k
$60k dp
$240k financed @ 30yr fixed
Payments = $1600/mth
$2400/mth rents
50% rule = $1200/mth
Cash flow = -$400/mth on $60000 invested
Now remember, this is best case scenario that I can even imagine for this area. This isn't conservative at all.
By the 2% rule, I should never pay more than $120k for a house that rents for this little. Yet these places regularly sell for 4x that amount. I understand that the 2% rule doesn't really hold true for the Northeast, but still... this best case scenario isn't even close to any deal i've seen discussed on BP.
Am I simply barking up the wrong neighborhood/town/region if I want to be landlord? Should I consider a completely different strategy for this area? Should I consider a completely different area altogether?
What am I missing?