Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago,

User Stats

18
Posts
1
Votes
Tom Wilhelm
  • Investor
  • Arlington, MA
1
Votes |
18
Posts

Boston area: A landlord investor's no-man's-land?

Tom Wilhelm
  • Investor
  • Arlington, MA
Posted

Let me explain the thought process...

I've spent the better part of 6 months pouring over the market in an area near my current residence. The typical family 4b/2ba ranges from ~$400 to $550k AVR in the area I've been researching.

2b/1ba rents in these multis fall mostly between $1100 and $1500

So let me walk myself through the math and someone can tell me where I've gone wrong:

Assume best case scenario:
$400k ARV
$0 repairs needed

People here seem to think that anything above 75% ARV is a non-starter. Well I've never seen a $300k multi anywhere near the area I'm talking about, but lets assume one exists...

So I'm in for $300k
$60k dp
$240k financed @ 30yr fixed
Payments = $1600/mth

$2400/mth rents
50% rule = $1200/mth

Cash flow = -$400/mth on $60000 invested

Now remember, this is best case scenario that I can even imagine for this area. This isn't conservative at all.

By the 2% rule, I should never pay more than $120k for a house that rents for this little. Yet these places regularly sell for 4x that amount. I understand that the 2% rule doesn't really hold true for the Northeast, but still... this best case scenario isn't even close to any deal i've seen discussed on BP.

Am I simply barking up the wrong neighborhood/town/region if I want to be landlord? Should I consider a completely different strategy for this area? Should I consider a completely different area altogether?

What am I missing?

Loading replies...