Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

523
Posts
513
Votes
Jon K.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
513
Votes |
523
Posts

Wrapping my head around 30 yr vs 15 yr loan

Jon K.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
Posted

I was hoping folks could help me weigh the pros and cons of using one term over the other for a buy and hold investment. As I think long term about rehabs and refinances or even turnkeys when the numbers work I keep flip-flopping between the two. In my specific circumstance i do not "need" the cash flow. All profit after reserves for maintenance/cap ex/etc will rolled into new investments.

For the sake of the conversation let's say this was a fresh refinance on a BRRRR so we have 75% LTV. I know you have more cash in hand on a per month basis with a 30 year but with the lower interest rate of a 15 year your total profits would be higher. You'd still have access to the equity through a HELOC but then you're making interest payments via a variable rate to use your own money. At the same time with a 15 year your payments amortize faster which to me seems the equivalent of lowering expenses faster without effort.

I know this is all very dependent on individual goals and circumstances but what else may I be missing? I'm currently thinking that as long as I stiil have positive cash flow I'd be better off doing a 15 each time.

Loading replies...