Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jon K.

Jon K. has started 52 posts and replied 528 times.

Post: Buying homes at auctions

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532
Quote from @Darvin Ezell:
Quote from @Jon K.:

I would focus more on how good of a deal it was vs how little it cost. I haven't bought a lot at auction but the best deal I got at one was:

Through the fog of memory (don't feel like looking up the exact amounts), in late 2021, I paid around 140k for a 4 bedroom single family detached property. I believe I put about 60k into the rehab which included adding a fifth bedroom to the basement. It appraised for 320k which is obviously a great spread but you have to remember closing costs, carrying costs, hard money costs and the cost of the refinance. When it was all said and done I still ended up being able to pull about 5 to 10k more out of it than I put into it.

Current mortgage including taxes and insurance is $1,519 and it's currently rented for $2,546/month.

Yes, you can buy a house at auction that you then flip and sell for market value.

And yes, I have participated in online auctions.

This reply is over a year old, but did you have the hard money lender you were using already in place before you bid? Or did you get approved for a certain amount before you went to auction? How'd that work?

At the time I was active enough that I had a few sources of reliable money. I generally went with private money first because I’d get better rates and terms. But I knew and had worked with a couple of hard money lenders often enough as well to know that they’d fund any purchase in the range I was looking to buy in without issue if my private lenders didn’t have the capital or weren’t interested.


So to answer your question I already had several lenders in place that I had worked with previously. I didn’t have a pre-approval amount per se, I just knew that I didn’t have to worry about funding for anything under maybe half a million and my typical purchase and rehab was in the 150 to 250 range.

Post: Refinance portion of brrrr

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532

It's going to depend on the lender, how it's titled and what kind of refinance you are doing.

If you're doing a conventional cash out refinance, a lot of lenders are going to require a 3 to 6 month seasoning period prior to refinancing and it will have to be rented first. If you're doing a rate and term refinance, there's typically not a seasoning period but again it's common for lenders to require it be rented first.

If you're doing a DSCR cash out refi, it may not need to be rented first but you're probably paying a higher rate.

Your best option is to call a loan broker you trust and go through the options based on your current situation. There's no reason to wait, call them now so that you understand the options.

Post: $500k to Invest, What Would You Do?

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Jeremy H.:

I'd be tempted into doing an STR (maybe with a higher down payment to ensure cashflow, just run ROI numbers) or an apartment complex - I personally wouldn't mess w/ small stuff. Even developing a mobile home park, affordable townhomes or self storage.

A "miserable corporate job to no where" isn't all that bad - health insurance benefits, 401k matching, probably some sort of discount stock purchase plan, stability, lenders like it. Sounds like she has a good W2. 

Netting 30k/month isn't a small feat - especially without putting in consistent work. You really need a business or a commercial asset in my opinion - contractor bays, oil change type centers -something that everyone uses. Think if one house grosses 1k/month, then it may net say $500/month (after maintenance/repairs, CapEx). You're asking for 30k month - that's 60 of those houses...in a few years. Not saying it's impossible, but that is a full fledged business. You really need an infrastructure to run something like that - systems, people...and you have to keep it going.

Also - if you invest that 500k in an S&P 500 tracker - you'll average 8%/year - 40k. Not too shabby for literally 0 work or thought. 

I would also take a look at your expenses - 15k/month in Michigan? Is it really that HCOL of an area? 15k/month = 180k/year. FIRE would essentially be pulling 4% a year so she needs around 4.5mm. The two of you together at 30k/month = 9mm. I think you'll need some time to get to that number, honestly. 

The other serious honest question you have to ask yourself (you're wanting in invest a lot of capital - and your sister's at that) - how successful have you been in RE? What do your yearly numbers look like? What's your overall ROI and cashflow? Have you been more or less successful than you predicted? Why?


I find it ironic how people categorize their no where corporate job then say that job has created this wealth for them and security.. Also I find it kind of humerus were 15 years ago when i joined BP the FI number was 5k to many up to 10k  now its 15k and up.. ( which is realistic in my mind I never thought 5k was realistic.  Getting to 30k or more a month on NET NET cash flow takes a boat load of capital or you need to be in the transactional side of the industry. 

 Agreed, or it takes a lot of time and rising rents. Realistically it's probably both. 

Post: Buying Down Points

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532

Approach it like an investment. You're spending X to save(earn) Y. What's the annual ROI on the cost of the points to you in terms of savings? Does that fit your personal criteria for a return you'd like to get on your investment? If so, do it. If not, don't.

Buying it down to 6% looks like you're getting a roughly 20% return on the cost of the points. That's pretty damn solid if you ask me.

Post: My first rental, 11 years later.

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532
Quote from @Kimberly White:

Hey Jon, congratulations on such a huge milestone. Reflecting on that first purchase can be a real eye-opener.. it reminds me of when I first got into rental properties and felt like I was jumping into the unknown. You can crunch all the numbers you want, but sometimes it still takes that initial leap of faith.

It’s amazing to see how your townhome evolved from modest cash flow to what it’s pulling in now. The fact that you evaluated whether to sell or do a cash-out refi shows you’re playing a long game and keeping your options open. I’ve often found that a property’s best path forward isn’t always the most obvious.. sometimes letting go unlocks capital for the next wave of growth, sometimes holding tight after refinancing keeps that reliable monthly boost (from what I’ve heard).

I had a friend who snagged a multi-family in a similar price range about a decade ago.. at the time, it felt like a giant step. Fast-forward, and she’s used the equity to pick up two more invsetment properties. That’s the magic of real estate compounding over time, and it’s stories like yours that really highlight this.. from what i read in the street journal, that slow build often outperforms shorter-term stategies.

From an investor-friendly agent’s perspective, being willing to dig into the neighborhoods (driving for dollars) and having a robust network.. from probate attorneys to local contractors.. can pay off big. A thorough cash-flow analysis up front goes hand-in-hand with finding those hidden gems. All channels can work, but in my experience, the greatest oppportunities often pop up when you know exactly what your returns need to look like and keep your ear to the ground in your market. When you mentioned pulling out $110k, that’s the perfect snapshot of how equity can turn into future deals without selling outright.

So, if you were to rinse and repeat, would you still go for another rental thta’s already turnkey, or would you look for something you could add value to?

I couldn't agree more about the network. I am a firm believer in the adage that your network is your net worth. I've gotten deals and formed partnerships through some very unorthodox connections over the years.

To answer your question, it will always depend on the specifics of the deal in front of me but in general I'd still prefer value-add. I have an amazing GC now that I trust completely so I can do a full gut reno without stepping foot in the property and I wouldn't lose sleep over it. With value-add, I know I'm getting at least some of my capital out when I'm done and I'll end up with a house that should not need any significant cap-ex for quite a while.

I'd do turnkey too if the numbers looked good enough but the reality is in the market where I have boots on the ground you're talking about close to 60k between down payment and closing costs for maybe $200/month in cash flow. The ROI just isn't there. Speaking in generalities of course based on what I usually buy.

But, these days I'm trying to be more passive so things like syndications are a more likely path for future investments. I have solid property management in place with my portfolio so the time commitment is minimal but it still takes up space in my brain.

Post: How to go about Inheriting tenants

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532

I've inherited several tenants who were below market. They all left at the first sniff of an increase despite still being below market and they were all pretty upset about it. No good will that the former landlord created will transfer with the property. Do not expect to keep them and be prepared to have to evict.

If the jurisdiction this property is in requires anything in place in order to evict such as rental licenses, etc., get them in place before discussing an increase with the tenant because it's much easier to get inspections and repairs done when the tenant cooperates.

Post: My first rental, 11 years later.

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532
Quote from @Sadler Surratt:

Hi @Jon K. 

Congrats on an incredible journey! 🎉 It’s amazing to see how one smart investment can completely shift your financial future. Pulling $110K in equity from a property you originally bought for $108K is a huge win—and a perfect example of why long-term investing pays off.

Your reflection on remembering where it all started is so important. It’s easy to get caught up in the next deal or the grind, but taking a step back to acknowledge progress is what keeps the momentum going. Excited to see where you put that equity next—what’s the plan for reinvesting? 


I'm mostly focused on more passive investments moving forward: syndications and private lending to known reliable entities.

Post: My first rental, 11 years later.

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532

I did something this week that caused me to reflect a bit on where I started and how far I've come. It was a fun realization so I thought I'd share it here.

I purchased my first real rental 11 years ago off the MLS for 108k (put 20% down). It's a 3 bed, 1.5 bath townhome. Rented for about $1250/month at the time. It was turnkey so I didn't have to do a thing to it. Over those 11 years it has been occupied for all but 3 months until this most recent turn. Typical maintenance and capex, no real disasters. It has basically printed money for me from day 1.

Fast forward to today. I recently went through an exercise where I examined each property in my portfolio to decide if my capital was positioned the way I wanted it to be and that had me consider selling this property. I ran the numbers two ways: selling vs cash out refi back up to a 75% LTV. I came to the conclusion that a cash out refi was the way to go even though it won't cash flow great afterwards (it'll still be positive about $200/month). Today that same property rents for about $2,400/month and it appraised for 235k.

This is the part that I thought was fun that also made me reflect on things. I was able to pull 110k of equity of out this property that I had bought for 108k. And the reality was I only put 20% down plus closing costs. I know, inflation and those aren't the same as today's dollars etc. But still... It's easy for me to get lost in the grind or to focus on goals instead of progress so I'm glad that I took this moment to remember where it all started and that was with a gamble on this one property that has paid off ever since.

Post: Why You Should Never Take a Break as a Real Estate Investor

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532
Quote from @Jonathan Greene:
Quote from @Jon K.:
Quote from @Jonathan Greene:

Taking action isn't only investing in real estate. You should take a break from buying if the deals don't match your buy box, you are out of money, or for several other reasons (partner isn't on board, over-leveraged on different properties, acting out of FOMO, etc.). Still, you should never take a break from looking, touring, vetting, and analyzing. You can't take six months off from reviewing properties and hop back in like nothing happened. Stuff happened.

If I were to sum up the one thing that I think investors aren't doing enough, it would be getting real-life reps. Real-life reps, to me, means seeing properties in person, whatever your asset class. What you see on the spreadsheet is a small part of every story. Boots on the ground, or lack thereof, are where the mistakes are made. Of course, the smaller the property, the more necessary that you see every inch of it because there isn't a business running on top of the land like large-scale multifamily, self-storage, industrial, and more. But even if you want to do large deals, you need comparable reps.

Technology has made it easy to "analyze" deals. Still, if you aren't whittling down the number you are analyzing financially to a small subset you see before deciding what to do, you are missing an essential part of getting to the tipping point of expertise in your field. The most successful investors have looked at thousands of properties in person in their lifetimes. So, even when the market is challenging, you can still see properties and stay current.

Don't take a break when the rates are high. Don't take a break when the weather is terrible. Don't take a break when others are taking a break. Removing all skills from the equation, if you don't take a break from participating as a real estate investor in some way each day, you will stay far ahead of everyone else who keeps subbing themselves out and then asking to get back in when the game is already out of reach.


I respectfully and emphatically disagree. Take a break when you need to take a break. Whether it's for a month, or 6, or a year. Burnout is a real thing and there are more important things than real estate investing. I don't care if I'm ahead or behind of anyone else because my goals are not relative to anyone else's progress.

I get your point that staying active keeps your skills sharp and that if you're active when others aren't you will have access to opportunities that they do not. You'll also continue to be building your brand, your network, your experience, etc. But if it's coming at the cost of your health or something else important than time with your family then it's perfectly fine to step back when you need to.


I think this goes without saying. If your mental health is compromised by looking at deals, you should stop. But that's not in any way what the post was saying. There was no pressure to stay in; it was about getting reps and not opting out. If your mental health is so fractured that you can't go to an Open House on a four-family down the block from you, that is something to focus on first. It's a commentary on those who take breaks because of market dynamics or because their buy box is too tight for the current market.


 It only goes without saying if you’re dealing with a smarter person than myself. In that case I respectfully and emphatically agree.

Post: Why You Should Never Take a Break as a Real Estate Investor

Jon K.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Perry Hall, MD
  • Posts 534
  • Votes 532
Quote from @Jonathan Greene:

Taking action isn't only investing in real estate. You should take a break from buying if the deals don't match your buy box, you are out of money, or for several other reasons (partner isn't on board, over-leveraged on different properties, acting out of FOMO, etc.). Still, you should never take a break from looking, touring, vetting, and analyzing. You can't take six months off from reviewing properties and hop back in like nothing happened. Stuff happened.

If I were to sum up the one thing that I think investors aren't doing enough, it would be getting real-life reps. Real-life reps, to me, means seeing properties in person, whatever your asset class. What you see on the spreadsheet is a small part of every story. Boots on the ground, or lack thereof, are where the mistakes are made. Of course, the smaller the property, the more necessary that you see every inch of it because there isn't a business running on top of the land like large-scale multifamily, self-storage, industrial, and more. But even if you want to do large deals, you need comparable reps.

Technology has made it easy to "analyze" deals. Still, if you aren't whittling down the number you are analyzing financially to a small subset you see before deciding what to do, you are missing an essential part of getting to the tipping point of expertise in your field. The most successful investors have looked at thousands of properties in person in their lifetimes. So, even when the market is challenging, you can still see properties and stay current.

Don't take a break when the rates are high. Don't take a break when the weather is terrible. Don't take a break when others are taking a break. Removing all skills from the equation, if you don't take a break from participating as a real estate investor in some way each day, you will stay far ahead of everyone else who keeps subbing themselves out and then asking to get back in when the game is already out of reach.


I respectfully and emphatically disagree. Take a break when you need to take a break. Whether it's for a month, or 6, or a year. Burnout is a real thing and there are more important things than real estate investing. I don't care if I'm ahead or behind of anyone else because my goals are not relative to anyone else's progress.

I get your point that staying active keeps your skills sharp and that if you're active when others aren't you will have access to opportunities that they do not. You'll also continue to be building your brand, your network, your experience, etc. But if it's coming at the cost of your health or something else important than time with your family then it's perfectly fine to step back when you need to.