Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

67
Posts
25
Votes
Dave Blackman
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Santa Barbara, CA
25
Votes |
67
Posts

Paying off properties vs. buying more properties

Dave Blackman
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Santa Barbara, CA
Posted

Hi all,

I just purchased my first two properties in KCMO and am looking into more.  I have enough cash to purchase one more conventionally then I have to start getting creative (portfolio loans, private lending, etc).

Do you think it would be more advantageous to put monthly savings towards paying off the principle on the two current properties (could pay them both off in about 4 years with HELOC method which would save me long-term about 45k in interest), or continue to pay the conventional 30 year amortization/interest on those two and focus on acquiring more properties?

I know conventional wisdom says acquire more property, acquire more debt -- but as a "normal" person who uses extra savings left over from my disposable income (read: I'm not wealthy), I'm torn between going full force on reducing debt on the current properties vs. acquiring more debt via other means.  With the interest rates looking like upward movement is imminent, I'm swayed towards acquiring as many loans locked in at today's lower rates as I can max out at -- and then focus on paying them off starting in 1-2 years.

Thoughts?

Loading replies...