I'm a new brand new Real Estate Investor. I did my very first deal this past month. Bought a SFR (4-2) with a tenant already installed and approximately $450 free cash flow before repairs and Capex. I'm banking all of that cash flow toward the next down payment along with everything I can save from my "real" job.
So, looking for advice on whether to cash out my Texas Teacher Retirement (about 100k before taxes & penalty) to put toward the down on two or three more rental properties. I no longer work in the school system, so I am no longer contributing to the pension.
Here are the facts: If I leave it, I can retire at age 62 and draw approximately 40k per year until I pass away. If I withdraw it, I have to pay income taxes plus the 10% penalty to the IRS for early withdrawal.
I figure I can turn that into 2 or 3 down payments on SFR's that will cash flow about $400 to $500 per month each or perhaps look into a duplex or quadplex...I haven't run numbers on what those cash flow.
Any advice or angles I'm not seeing with this. Thanks in advance for your perspective.
I think you should be able to roll your Texas Teacher Retirement (it's a 401(a) plan I believe) over to a self-directed IRA. Then you can invest from the IRA and you won't take a penalty since you're not cashing it out. There are restrictions to doing it this way as the money has to stay within the IRA and can not benefit you in anyway (until you retire that is).
Tagging @Dmitriy Fomichenko to help you out with this.
Good question.
If you are looking to continue to grow your retirement funds, you can transfer the former employer plan to a self-directed IRA, or a solo 401(k) if you are self-employed. You can then invests the retirement funds in real estate directly. All the income will flow back to the IRA or solo 401(k) and continue to grow on a tax-deferred basis. This is a way to continue to grow your retirement plan by investing in real estate. Following is the differences and similarities between an IRA and a solo 4K.
The Self-Directed IRA and Solo 401k Similarities
The Self-Directed IRA and Solo 401k Differences
I think you should be able to roll your Texas Teacher Retirement (it's a 401(a) plan I believe) over to a self-directed IRA. Then you can invest from the IRA and you won't take a penalty since you're not cashing it out. There are restrictions to doing it this way as the money has to stay within the IRA and can not benefit you in anyway (until you retire that is).
Tagging @Dmitriy Fomichenko to help you out with this.
@Michael Le thanks for the mention!
Brad, there are number of factors you need to consider such as investment goals, risk tolerance, investment experience, etc. You are welcome to contact my office and request complimentary consultation so that I can learn more about your goals and then be in a better position to give you a recommendation.
Wow. Hadn't thought about a self-directed IRA.
Allow me to give some additional context. I'm currently blessed to be able to sock away the max contribution to a 401k with my current company & get a near dollar for dollar match from my employer.
My wife & I have approximately 300k currently in traditional 401k plans & will continue to max those out each year.
The thought was to jump start the REI portfolio in an attempt to reach a tipping point & replace a significant portion of our current monthly income with the added bonus of equity & possible appreciation.
Still think the self directed IRA is the way to go?
In addition, can the IRA LLC borrow from Fannie or Freddie? If not, then financing deals will need to be a little more creative.
The self-directed IRA might work for you, but you can only fund it with IRA or employer sponsored plan such as 401k that is with past employer only. If you have a 401k with your current employer and not reached retirement age yet - you will not be able to move those funds.
Did you say you can cash out TX Teacher Retirement of about $100K before taxes/penalties? That means that after you factor taxes/penalties you will end up with about 40% less. But if you kept it - you could get $40K/yr for a life? I would keep it, it is very unlikely you can get such income from REI with those funds. But even if there was a possibility - there would be risk involved but the income from your pension would be guaranteed. No brainier to me unless I'm missing something...
The loan for an IRA must be non-recourse. There is only a handful of lenders who specialize in these kind of loans, you can get a list here:
https://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/2810/50272-lis...
I do have one lender who can get a loan from Freddie, but the min. loan amount is $750K. However they offer largest LTV (up to 83%) and the lowest rates.
Yes a self-directed IRA can incorporate a non-recourse loan but it will subject the IRA to UDFI (
https://www.irs.gov/irm/part7/irm_07-027-008.html).
That is why it is better to open a solo 401k because a solo 401k is not subject to UDFI.
For a list of IRA lenders visit the following:
Thank you for the response. Yes. If I leave the money with the Teacher Retirement System until I turn 63 (21 years from now), I can collect approximately 40k per year. The pension formula is complicated, but that should be in the ballpark. All of that assumes the Texas Legislature doesn't loot the pension & repurpose for other intentions which has been attempted in the last couple of sessions.
While I see how 40k per year guaranteed would be hard to replicate, on a cash in the retirement account basis, if my wife and I are already maxing out 401k contributions with our current employers, would you still advise against trying to kick start REI now with the withdrawn proceeds?
10 rent homes of at least 100k paid off cash flowing 1k per month apiece in 10 years sounds like it could be a lot more than 40k till I kick the bucket. Plus it leaves something to my wife and or son.
Thank you for engaging with me as a thinking partner.
Hi @Brad Gibson,
I am by no means an expert and especially not an expert in retirement. However I would take 40K a year every year instead of 100K today. You are going to be fighting to get that 100K to make you 40K a year (I figure more like 8K in the short term that will gradually increase).
Best of luck in whatever you decide!
I wouldn't be too quick to say that $40k a year 21 years from now is worth more than $100k today. Time Value of Money is a powerful concept. That $40k a year doesn't start for 21 years so the present value of that money is lower than you would think. You could grow that $100k to $400-500k after 21 years with jut 7-8% return on your money. You could get that relatively passively as a private lender. You could get more than that by more actively investing that money. Of course you could lose it too.
But if you got it to $500k you could get an annuity at that time that provides you similar numbers. Point is I don't think it is clear cut.