Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
7
Votes
Jesse Mistretta
  • Holly Springs, NC
7
Votes |
17
Posts

Areas in North Carolina

Jesse Mistretta
  • Holly Springs, NC
Posted

so my question is to the people who live near I am which is wake county. I would like to know which areas I should stay away from and which areas are for the really wealthy or the middle class. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that holly springs is a little more expensive than were let's say Fayetteville is, but Fayetteville has a lot of homes that I could afford. My price range is 150,000

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,690
Posts
3,431
Votes
Chris Martin
  • Investor
  • Willow Spring, NC
3,431
Votes |
5,690
Posts
Chris Martin
  • Investor
  • Willow Spring, NC
Replied

Lori has the right idea, buying older properties with good cash flow in growth-oriented, appreciating areas. Smaller homes can make great returns over time in HS and in Garner. Both are good demographically. Realize that the "standard" Garner and HS numbers you see from theoretically knowledgeable data sources are significantly skewed. See my post about for Garner opinions about perceived growth.

While Lori (and I) will see appreciation, it's because of scarcity of product. Here's the easiest ways I can drive home the point. Drive south on Avent Ferry Rd. Start at Hwy 55, but start paying attention after you pass the schools on your left. As you drive along, hopefully slowly or with a passender who can help with your 'test', count the number of new developments going in. No, you won't see signs. Too early for that. Count the number of bulldozers, clear cut tracts, new "improvements" (roads
without anything else (no houses yet...) and you'll get an idea of what 2005 looked like about 5 miles north. I stop at New Hill Rd, since I always turn right there to go to our storage unit.

Turn left to explore and see if the home building explosion continues. It may... and eventually you run into Fuquay, which went through a growth spell like HS several years ago, and continues today. It is still be going on.

So.

How many new houses going in (being built) are 1000 sq.ft? None. How many under $100K? None.

Lori and I are in, percent wise, a shrinking market with our <$100K houses. Well, probably >$100K now. Builders build at $250K+. But there is constant, and increasing, demand for reasonably priced rentals. Hence, our products become more valuable over time.

When growth eventually stops, our rent increases stop. But values increase due to scarcity of product (reasonable cost housing) and our 'rent floor' continues to rise as growth continues. It's the classic 'value proposition' model that REI celebrate in (primarily population) growth centric areas. Costal cities see this effect in scarcity of land. HS sees it in scarcity of entry level rental property.

My 2 cents.

Loading replies...