Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
4
Votes
Jason Morton
  • unemployed
  • Vancouver, WA
4
Votes |
9
Posts

The 2% rule

Jason Morton
  • unemployed
  • Vancouver, WA
Posted

complete newbie here but, I'm reading "the ultimate begginers guide to real estate investing" (the free book you get when joining bigger pockets) and I stumbled across the 2% rule which states your monthly rent should be at least 2% of the purchase price.  So basically if you buy a house for $100,000 you should be able to rent it for $2000 per month.  I live in Vancouver where the vacancy rate of rentals is 2.4% way below the national average of 6.8%, and houses out here are renting for way less than 2%.  My mentor is renting his properties at about the local median and for his $240,000 homes he is renting them for $1500 per month (.6%) according to this book this is a terrible investment. this book states that he should be renting this house for $4800 per month which would be impossible.  Am I missing something?  Maybe this rule is more for people buying MFH's in the ghetto?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,982
Posts
600
Votes
Jassem A.
  • Investor
  • Pennsylvania
600
Votes |
1,982
Posts
Jassem A.
  • Investor
  • Pennsylvania
Replied

2% or better is easier to find in financially depressed areas but it is not impossible to find in the better areas. Most of the time they will not be on the MLS or you would need to offer significantly less and/or do some work to the property for it to be livable.

Loading replies...